[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-2733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Ondra Chaloupka commented on JBTM-2733:
---------------------------------------
Hi [~tomjenkinson], I was wondering on your comment
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-2733?focusedCommentId=13284121#comme... and
now I found some time to go through the XA spec for it. I wasn't able to find reason
behind why the recover sequence should be {{xa_recover(START), xa_commit/rb,
xa_recover(END)}} and can't be e.g. like {{xa_recover(START|END), xa_commit/rb}}.
Would you be so kind and elaborate a bit on this? Or can you point me to spec/article
where I got information how this is expected to be used? It's quite possible that I
just haven't read/searched properly.
I'm just curious.
Thanks in advance.
Adding section about inflow transactions and EIS interaction
------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBTM-2733
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-2733
Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: Documentation
Affects Versions: 5.3.4.Final
Reporter: Ondra Chaloupka
Assignee: Tom Jenkinson
I would like ask for enhancing Narayana documentation for section where information about
inflow transactions and interaction with EIS would be part of.
This ask for the addition came from discussion about behaviour of inflow transaction on
jbossts mailing list. Particularly information how EIS and TM is expected to interoperate
during recovery process. E.g. how EIS is expected to finish transaction when TM jvm crash
occurs or how EIS is expected to finish transaction when participant of txn involved under
management of TM (TM is manager of subordinate transaction) and such participant
independently decides to rollback (after prepare is confirmed) which causes heuristic
exception being thrown to EIS RAR and transaction is put to heuristic state.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)