[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-3068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Tom Jenkinson commented on JBTM-3068:
-------------------------------------
I think it is because they were running at identical times 16-Oct-2018 00:00 and
interfered with each other.
The reason catelyn can run two jobs simulateously is to allow us to send the kill commands
but it seems to cause conflicts like this
Byteman can not submit or remove the scripts when running
TestCommitMarkableResourceFailActivate
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBTM-3068
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-3068
Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
Issue Type: Bug
Components: JTA, Testing
Reporter: Amos Feng
Assignee: Amos Feng
Priority: Minor
{code}
[ERROR]
testFailAfterPrepare(com.hp.mwtests.ts.jta.commitmarkable.TestCommitMarkableResourceFailActivate)
Time elapsed: 2.782 s <<< ERROR!
java.lang.Exception:
The remote byteman agent reported an error:
ERROR failed to find loaded rule with name Fail first phase2Commit
ERROR failed to find loaded rule with name Return not inflight
ERROR No rule scripts to remove
at org.jboss.byteman.agent.submit.Submit$Comm.readResponse(Submit.java:966)
at org.jboss.byteman.agent.submit.Submit.submitRequest(Submit.java:790)
at org.jboss.byteman.agent.submit.Submit.deleteScripts(Submit.java:697)
at org.jboss.byteman.agent.submit.Submit.deleteRulesFromFiles(Submit.java:649)
at org.jboss.byteman.contrib.bmunit.BMUnit.unloadScriptFile(BMUnit.java:259)
at org.jboss.byteman.contrib.bmunit.BMUnitRunner$7.evaluate(BMUnitRunner.java:296)
at org.jboss.byteman.contrib.bmunit.BMUnitRunner$6.evaluate(BMUnitRunner.java:263)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
at org.jboss.byteman.contrib.bmunit.BMUnitRunner$1.evaluate(BMUnitRunner.java:97)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:365)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:272)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:236)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:159)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:386)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:323)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:143)
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)