I think that in the multi fork case, you know how many parallel processes you need on node
entry (based on the process variable).
But I think that is not applicable for the case I am facing ;)
I mean : I am dealing with the insurance business... In theory, it is possible to close a
claim (main process closed) but afterwards, there is new data available... so some parts
(sub processes) could be started again.
I think the same happens when you are dealing with legal files, ...
So that is why I have A. the subprocess (there is always at least one invoice, which I
have to wait for a certain time in the flow and afterwards some automatic handling can be
started) and B. that sub process can be started seperately (in the case there are n
invoices)
On the one hand I think that this might be again some weird situation I am facing (I
don't have years of work flow experience). But otherwise, I think there must be quite
some situations where this can actually happen (so I might not be designing processes from
Mars ;) )
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4183219#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...