Re: [rules-users] Fact Execution Order
by Nawrocki, Dan (IS)
I want to control the order of firing for facts that match a single
rule. I'm using Drools 5.0.1. Is there any way to do this?
My problem can be boiled down as follows. I have an array structure
that I want to conditionally copy to a new array structure. I would
like to order of the destination array to match the source array. The
code to insert facts into working memory increments in ascending order.
It is equivalent to:
for( Object o : sourceArray )
ksess.insert( convertToMyFact( o ) );
I have constructed my rules as such:
rule "rule1"
when
$f : MyFact( prop == "testVal" )
then
copyToDestination( $f.prop, $f.index );
end
After running, however, the destination array appears in reverse order:
source[0] == destination[5]
source[1] == destination[4]
source[2] == destination[3]
source[3] == destination[2]
source[4] == destination[1]
source[5] == destination[0]
Which seems to make sense if the facts are evaluated as if they were
popped off a stack. Is there any way to force Drools to use a list
instead? Or should I just insert facts in reverse order?
I would like the order:
source[0] == destination[0]
source[1] == destination[1]
etc.
Thanks,
Dan
14 years, 11 months
Error: unable to resolve method
by xalperte
I'm having a problem a little odd trying to fire rules using the Guvnor.
In Guvnor I have a package named package kobo.regularSafaris, inside this
package I have defined rules (with some DSL definitions), a decision table
(xls) and two functions.
The problem is that when I'm trying to call the functions in the consequence
of a rule I'm having the following error:
org.drools.runtime.rule.ConsequenceException: [Error: unable to resolve
method:
kobo.regularSafaris.AddBookingPayment.addBookingPayment(kobo.regularSafaris.BookingRequest,
java.lang.Integer, java.lang.Integer) [arglength=3]]
[Near : {... Unknown ....}]
^
[Line: 1, Column: 0]
at
org.drools.runtime.rule.impl.DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler.handleException(DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler.java:23)
at org.drools.common.DefaultAgenda.fireActivation(DefaultAgenda.java:943)
at org.drools.common.DefaultAgenda.fireNextItem(DefaultAgenda.java:885)
at org.drools.common.DefaultAgenda.fireAllRules(DefaultAgenda.java:1086)
at
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.fireAllRules(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:660)
at
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.fireAllRules(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:632)
at
org.drools.impl.StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.fireAllRules(StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:187)
at
com.rudder.packages.test.rules.PricesRulesTestCase.testNobelLowSeasonPrices(PricesRulesTestCase.java:108)
The function definition is as follows:
function void addBookingPayment(BookingRequest request, int days, int
percentage) {
PaymentPolicy payment = new PaymentPolicy();
payment.setPercentage(percentage);
if( days > 0 ) {
DateMidnight dueDate = new
DateMidnight(request.getDepartureDate().getTime()).minusDays(days);
payment.setType("DEFERRED");
payment.setDueDate(dueDate.toDate());
} else {
payment.setType("NOW");
payment.setDueDate(null);
}
List payments = request.getBookingData().getPayments();
if(payments == null) {
payments = new ArrayList();
request.getBookingData().setPayments(payments);
}
payments.add(payment);
}
And the rule that is calling the function is the following:
rule "Def. Deferred Payment for Credit Operator"
dialect "mvel"
when
$request: BookingRequest()
user: User(type == "Professional") from $request.user
eval($request.getBookingData().getPayments() == null) || ArrayList(size ==
0) from $request.bookingData.payments
eval( "true".equals($request.getUser().getTags().get("hasCredit")))
eval( (new
DateMidnight($request.getDepartureDate().getTime())).minusDays(35).toDate().after(new
Date()))
then
addBookingPayment($request, 35, 100);
end
It seems that the system is adding an extra "AddBookingPayment" to the
package name and this is causing the problem. Why is doing that? how can i
solve this?
Thanks in advance
--
View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/Error-unable-to-resolve-method-tp108194p108194.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
14 years, 11 months
Re: [rules-users] Nesting rules in Drools 5.x
by Greg Barton
I think this is fixed in trunk.
GreG
On Jan 3, 2010, at 0:56, orchid <maya.pollack(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to nest the LHS of rules in the following way:
rule "Rule_stilton"
when
$c : Cheese (type == "stilton")
then
$c.addRuleToList( "Rule_stilton" );
System.out.println("Rule_stilton was fired");
end
rule "Rule_price" extends "Rule_stilton"
when
Cheese(price <= 6.00) from $c
then
$c.addRuleToList( "Rule_price" );
System.out.println("Rule_price was fired");
End
The class Cheese contains a list field of matching rules of that instance
and a public function 'addRuleToList', which adds the rule name into that
list.
I get build error: "Unable to find declaration in list while generating the
consequence invoker". Is there some other way to reach that?
Thanks in advance.
Any help will be appreciated.
--
View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/Nesting-rules-in-Drools-5-x-tp106902p106902.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
14 years, 11 months
How to check an array field from LHS of a rule
by orchid
Hi All,
I'm using Drools 5.x. I have the following class:
public class Machine{
...
private List rules = new ArrayList();
...
}
The 'rules' list holds strings. I would like from my rule to check whether
that list contains the string "rule2".
I've tried doing this in the following ways, but get compilation error:
rule "rule1"
when
/*1st attempt:*/ $m:Machine(rules contains "rule2")
/*2nd attempt:*/ $m:Machine(rules.contains("rule2") )
then
...
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks in advance !!!
--
View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/How-to-check-an-array-field-from-LHS-of-a-rule-tp104...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
14 years, 11 months
Nesting rules in Drools 5.x
by orchid
Hi All,
I'm trying to nest the LHS of rules in the following way:
rule "Rule_stilton"
when
$c : Cheese (type == "stilton")
then
$c.addRuleToList( "Rule_stilton" );
System.out.println("Rule_stilton was fired");
end
rule "Rule_price" extends "Rule_stilton"
when
Cheese(price <= 6.00) from $c
then
$c.addRuleToList( "Rule_price" );
System.out.println("Rule_price was fired");
End
The class Cheese contains a list field of matching rules of that instance
and a public function 'addRuleToList', which adds the rule name into that
list.
I get build error: "Unable to find declaration in list while generating the
consequence invoker". Is there some other way to reach that?
Thanks in advance.
Any help will be appreciated.
--
View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/Nesting-rules-in-Drools-5-x-tp106902p106902.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
14 years, 11 months
Quantification of possible planner/solver solutions
by Pete Carapetyan
Geoffrey:
It is a source of fascination to me that you were able to come up with
a number for how many possible planner combinations there were for
each planner/solver example.
For example, where this kind of calculation comes from or how to derive my own ?
Example from Drools Solver Manual:
Set # students # exams/topics # periods # rooms #
possible solutions
exam_comp_set1 7883 607 54 7
1.11000574474221096210367623e+1052
14 years, 12 months
