Re: [rules-users] Planning Under Uncertainty

I'm adding support native for uncertainty to drools: the code is in a sub-project repository called "drools-chance". I'll probably commit an update next week, supporting the declaration of beans with distributions as fields. Full support in the rules, instead, will take some more time. I would like to understand better what you mean by "uncertain planning": are you considering actions with uncertain preconditions / effects or both? or are you referring to randomized search algorithms? Of course, you can always manage uncertainty explicitly, using additional facts and calculating the probabilities, but I would not recommend that unless you need a working prototype very quickly. Best, Davide p.s. The paper you found is old and obsolete, definitely not worthy looking at ( shame on the main author ;) ) -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Planning-Under-Uncertainty-... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.