Re: [rules-users] functions inside fact type declaration?

+1 on the full constructor. GreG On Aug 9, 2010, at 3:58 PM, Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com&gt; wrote: I thought about adding that, but I feel like we would just be reimplementing java, in this case. So, if you need anything else other than simple java beans, you should implement it as a java class. Regarding the constructor, I might still add a constructor that receives all fields as parameters, just to reduce verbosity when using the java dialect, but if you are using mvel dialect, you can use "with": rule ... when ... then with( person = new Person() ) { name = "Bob", age = 35 } insert( person ); end Edson 2010/8/9 Tina Vießmann < <tviessmann(a)stud.hs-bremen.de&gt; tviessmann(a)stud.hs-bremen.de&gt; > Hi, > > is it possible to define a function/constructor inside a fact type > declaration? If yes, how can it be done? > > Thank you :) > Tina > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > <rules-users@lists.jboss.org&gt;rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >