[rules-users] Template bug on "package" keyword

I am trying to incorporate several templates in a single output drl file. According to the 5.0.1 docs "package" is optional: Example 5.3. Rule template file: templates template header parameter-name-1 ... parameter-name-n package ... # optional However, it seems that the drools parser uses "package" as a keyword to identify when it has passed header information. Not having a "package" specifier in either 5.0.1 or 5.1.1 yields: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: value rule "rules for reject non-header @{id}" is not a valid column definition at org.drools.template.parser.ColumnFactory.getColumn(ColumnFactory.java:34) which cannot be overcome by tricks like // package a.b.c or # package a.b.c Are other people experiencing this? Is there a fix planned for the parser? -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Template-bug-on-packa... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.