Re: [rules-users] Checking for a lack of an object
2011/8/19 Raf <r.ventaglio(a)gmail.com>
You must not add the parenthesis after *not.*
This is not correct. You may even *have *to use parentheses unless the
negated condition is a conjunction or disjunction. The omission of the
parentheses is tolerated when the argument is a single Pattern.
-W
*
*
Try this:
rule "Flag missing Foos with values"
when
not Foo(stringProp=="blah", intProp==5)
then
System.err.println("A proper foo does not exist");
end
Bye
*Raf*
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.1 KB)