Re: [rules-users] Drools' use of hashCode

Hi all, I have encountered a situation I don't quite understand, I would be happy

have some explanations about it. This is my first post here and I'm quite new to all this so don't be afraid to go back to basics if I'm missing something: I have 3 classes : public class Child { private Date time; +get +set +constructor } public class Father { private Child child; private int value; +get +set +constructor public void setTime(Date d) { child.setTime(d); } } public class GdFather { private Father father; +get +set +constructor } then 2 rules : rule "1" when $father : Father(value==1) then $father.setTime(new Date(2)); $father.setValue(0); update($father); end rule "2" when $father : Father() $GdFather : GdFather(father==$father) then System.out.println($father); end //////////////////////////////////////// I didn't change the identity assert behavior, I insert a father and the corresponding GdFather in the workingMemory, and all seems to work OK. The issue occurs when I override the hashCode function in the Father class

if I use this definition : @Override public int hashCode() { return child.getTime().hashCode(); } then rule 2 is not fired after modification of the father, and is not

if I change the function to return child.hashCode() with a Child hashCode returning time.hashCode(). This also happens with a properly overriden equals function, and both

5.1.1 and 5.2.0.CR1. What I don't understand is why is it using the overriden hashCode function with an identity assert behavior? What is it used for? And it looks like

is using the overriden hashCode, but not equals, is that correct, and if

why? How can I get the second rule to fire and have a custom hashCode() ? Thank you in advance for your answers, M.H. -- View this message in context:

Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users