Re: [rules-users] RegEx in LHS

Markus, The engine processes the mappings in the order they are written, so you must always write more restrictive patterns first and less restrictive patterns second: [condition][]Title contains not {value}=title not matches {value} [condition][]Title contains {value}=title matches {value} []s Edson 2007/11/28, Markus Helbig <mhelbig81(a)googlemail.com >: > > Hi all, > > i'd like to have following DSL conditions > > [condition][]Title contains {value}=title matches {value} > [condition][]Title contains not {value}=title not matches {value} > > > Currently (using Drools 4.0.3) it seems the parsers resolves to the > first condtion and is matching the word "not" to {value}, so i tried > > [condition][]Title contains\s+{value}=title matches {value} > [condition][]Title contains\snot\s{value}=title not matches {value} > > > but this doesn't help, because second one again matches to the first > rule ... also it is missing one parameter ... > > Any solutions? > > Cheers > > Markus > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development Office: +55 11 3529-6000 Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users