I think it works.
Actually, just found it in the current Drools expert documentation
too. Shame on me...
Thanks.
-Simon
2011/7/18 Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com>:
I believe this
http://blog.athico.com/2007/05/dynamic-salience-expressions.html still
works.
On 18 July 2011 20:44, Simon Chen <simonchennj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am curious if we can inform Drools' execution based on properties
> within objects.
>
> In particular, the salience value is defined for each rule, in the
> sense that rule A has priority over rule B to execute. I am wondering
> if we can define some kinda of salience metric, such that object X has
> higher priority than object Y to be executed in the same rule.
>
> To give an example, I am (still) playing with implementing shortest
> path using a few rules. I have a rule for selecting a shortest path on
> a node (among all the paths received from its neighbors) to a source
> node, and another rule for propagating the shortest path on a node to
> neighboring nodes. When I have many nodes in my graph, I found that
> the paths propagated (via the second rule) are not always the
> shortest, while Dijkstra's algorithm always "propagate" from the node
> with the shortest distance to the source. The effect is that my rules
> are wasting most of the time propagating paths that would be dropped
> in the end anyway...
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks.
> -Simon
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users