Re: [rules-users] How to track constraint truth [was: Non short circuit ANDing]

While I am following this discussion with great interest, I am also feeling a little anxious about what I see here. In the parent thread, I recall that there was some talk of this functionality being contained in some kind of adjunct, or "outside the rule engine", application. I get the impression that what is now being discussed are changes to the rule-language that would allow this functionality to exist within the primary rule-engine. If I am mistaken (which I hope I am), please let me know. My concern about this stems from the fact that I have spent the better part of two years telling Java developers that this wasn't merely a different language for them to learn, but is more of a shift in the way that they think. The direction this discussion seems to be going (again, I hope I am misreading it), is to back away from the declarative programming approach. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-How-to-track-constraint-tru... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.