[rules-users] Mixing Drools language and Java implementions without performance loss

Hello everyone, as I try to find the best solution for a scheduling problem Drools Planner seems to be the perfect fit. Instead of using drl files I want to implement the rules in Java, but I still would like to use the power of Drools (Planner) to find the best solution as fast as possible. My first attempt is to use the Description API (Examples: https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/blob/master/drools-compiler/src/test...). This might work, but I wonder if I really have to write the whole rule this way. Of course I can use "eval" Expressions to integrate Java code, but I would like to know how expensive this is in certain situations. So, which information does Drools use to optimize the algorithm? An example taken from the Test class I mentioned: .lhs() .pattern("StockTick").constraint("company == \"RHT\"").end() .end() I guess it's important to select the StockTick by using the pattern. But what about the company criteria? Is using the constraint faster than invoking a method like "checkType"? .lhs().pattern("StockTick").name("myStockTick").eval().constraint( "checkCompany(myCheese, \"RHT\"").end() .end() In general, I would like to know which parts can be implemented in "secret Java" which the drools compiler doesn't know and which parts should be implemented by using the explicit descr api elements in order to use the full power of the Drools engine. Thanks for your answers! Kind regards Oliver