Re: [rules-users] Regression 5.1->5.2 with conflicting ClassNames

Added code examples... * Sample1:* import namespace1.MyObject; rule "r" when namespace2.MyObject( value == 3 ) MyObject( attr1 == "foo" ) //Here, got a parsing error stating "attr1" is not a field because it looks it up from namespace2.MyObject then // ... end *Sample2:* import namespace1.MyObject; declare MyLocalType val: namespace2.MyObject end rule "r1" when MyObject( attr1 == "foo" ) //Here, got a parsing error stating "attr1" is not a field because it looks it up from namespace2.MyObject then MyLocalType $mlt = new MyLocalType(); $mlt.setVal( new namespace2.MyObject() ); insert( $mlt ); end *Sample3 (continues Sample2 as the following is in the same DRL file):* rule "r2" when MyObject() //Here: there is no name conflict but, at execution time, the rule is not activated; //fully qualifying the fact type solved the issue (meaning activation seems to wait for namespace2.MyObject to fire the rule...) then // ... end On 28 October 2011 13:34, abr <alexis.brouard(a)haulogy.net&gt; wrote: