i see... when 3.2 will be available? :-) ok... so i'm writing the rules the wrong way? i need to put the and's on the same line separated by ','? i if wanted to the it the way i wrote the rules i would have to put a different name to each of the objects right? (mto1:MegaTransferObject mto2:MegaTransferObject, ect) this is a little complicated and i dindt saw it on the documentation...where i can read about it? i will rewrite the rules to match the right way... thanks... Joel G. Rivera-Gonzalez PRT "The first 90% of a project takes 90% of the time, the last 10% takes the other 90% of the time" - Murphy's Law ----- Original Message ---- From: Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com&gt; To: Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 6:44:22 PM Subject: Re: [rules-users] About String..."==" same as ".equals"? Joel, If it is the same object that you are trying to match against all of those constraints, just list all your constraints separated by ',' (comma): rule "dtv_discount_request" when mto : MegaTransferObject( orders_FkOrderTypeId == Constants.NEW_COMPLETED_ORDER_TYPE, ct:other_ChannelType -> ( ! ct.equalsIgnoreCase(Constants.CHANNEL_TYPE_RESELLER)), orders_FkChannelId != Constants.ISP_CHANNEL_ID_PRW, orders_FkChannelId != Constants.ISP_CHANNEL_ID_TLD, orders_FkChannelId != Constants.ISP_CHANNEL_ID_AOL, other_HasDtvDiscountRequest == false, pl:phoneList_GovernmentAccount -> ( (pl == null) || ( pl.equals(Constants.FLAG_NO)) ), cp:customerProfile_DtvDiscount -> ( (cp == null) || ( cp.equals(Constants.FLAG_NO)) ), oa:other_AccountType -> ( ( oa == null) || ( oa.equals( Constants.PHONE_TYPE_RESIDENTIAL)) ) ) then menu.add(new String[]{Constants.SERVICE_ASSURANCE_TREE_MENU_DSL, Constants.SERVICE_ASSURANCE_MENU_DTV_DISCOUNT_REQUEST}); end Just remember: * you must have one and only one pattern for each single object you want to match in each rule, i.e., the mapping between patterns and object instances is always one-to-one. * constraints are separated by ',' (comma), and ',' has an implicit meaning of AND between constraints * version 3.0.x does not support OR between constraints, so the way around it is to use predicates like I demonstrated above. Version 3.2 already has support for connective OR constraints. I hope it helps. []s Edson Joel G. Rivera-González wrote: > i see...that would works...but now if you add stuff and make a rule > that look like this, the binding will not work... > > rule "dtv_discount_request" > when > MegaTransferObject(orders_FkOrderTypeId == > Constants.NEW_COMPLETED_ORDER_TYPE) and > not MegaTransferObject(ct:other_ChannelType -> > (ct.equalsIgnoreCase(Constants.CHANNEL_TYPE_RESELLER))) and > (not MegaTransferObject(orders_FkChannelId == > Constants.ISP_CHANNEL_ID_PRW) and > not MegaTransferObject(orders_FkChannelId == > Constants.ISP_CHANNEL_ID_TLD) and > not MegaTransferObject(orders_FkChannelId == > Constants.ISP_CHANNEL_ID_AOL)) and > (MegaTransferObject(phoneList_GovernmentAccount == null) or > MegaTransferObject(phoneList_GovernmentAccount == Constants.FLAG_NO)) and > (MegaTransferObject(customerProfile_DtvDiscount == null) or > MegaTransferObject(customerProfile_DtvDiscount == Constants.FLAG_NO)) and > (MegaTransferObject(other_AccountType == null) or > MegaTransferObject(other_AccountType == > Constants.PHONE_TYPE_RESIDENTIAL)) and > MegaTransferObject(other_HasDtvDiscountRequest == false) > then > menu.add(new > String[]{Constants.SERVICE_ASSURANCE_TREE_MENU_DSL, > Constants.SERVICE_ASSURANCE_MENU_DTV_DISCOUNT_REQUEST}); > end > > i was trying to bre creative and add megaTO: before all the > MegaTransferObject and it gave me the compilation error you > mention...but only after the third megaTO: > > > Joel G. Rivera-Gonzalez > PRT > > "The first 90% of a project takes 90% of the time, the last 10% takes > the other 90% of the time" - Murphy's Law > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com&gt; > To: Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 4:39:57 PM > Subject: Re: [rules-users] About String..."==" same as ".equals"? > > Joel, > > I just noticed in your last rule you do the binding to the same > variable: > > > megaTO:MegaTransferObject(other_AccountType == "RMS") > > megaTO:MegaTransferObject(other_HasDtvDiscountRequest == false) > > I thought that feature was already disabled... :( it should give you > an error of duplicate variable declaration! is it not raising an error > when compiling the rule?? > > The correct way of doing it if it is the same object is getting both > constraints in the same pattern: > > megaTO: MegaTransferObject( other_AccountType == "RMS", > other_HasDtvDiscountRequest == false) > > So, rules 1 and 2 are correct in not firing, since you would need 2 > different objects to match the 2 patterns in them. > The mapping between patterns and objects is "one-to-one". > > []s > Edson > > > > Joel G. Rivera-González wrote: > > > 1. i downloaded the latest release from the download page... > > 2. just one MTO...the returning arrayList should have arround 10 values. > > > > will do an example and (class and ruleFile) and send it to your email... > > > > thanks > > > > Joel G. Rivera-Gonzalez > > PRT > > > > "The first 90% of a project takes 90% of the time, the last 10% takes > > the other 90% of the time" - Murphy's Law > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com&gt; > > To: Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > > Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 3:29:26 PM > > Subject: Re: [rules-users] About String..."==" same as ".equals"? > > > > > > Joel, > > > > Your rules seems to be correct. > > Questions: > > > > 1. What JBRules version are you using? > > > > 2. How many MTO instances are you asserting in the working memory, that > > would match each Pattern in your rule? > > > > It may be an issue with "or". Can you provide a self contained test > > for me to investigate? > > > > Thank you > > Edson > > > > Joel G. Rivera-González wrote: > > > > > i have to be doing something wrong...but it make no sense... > > > a MegaTransferObject is asserted. > > > > > > case1: No rules fired. > > > rule "dtv_discount_request" > > > when > > > MegaTransferObject(other_AccountType == null) or > > > MegaTransferObject(other_AccountType == > > > Constants.PHONE_TYPE_RESIDENTIAL) > > > MegaTransferObject(other_HasDtvDiscountRequest == false) > > > then > > > menu.add(new > > > String[]{Constants.SERVICE_ASSURANCE_TREE_MENU_DSL, > > > Constants.SERVICE_ASSURANCE_MENU_DTV_DISCOUNT_REQUEST}); > > > end > > > > > > case 2: no rule fired. > > > > > > rule "dtv_discount_request" > > > when > > > MegaTransferObject(other_AccountType == null) or > > > MegaTransferObject(other_AccountType == "RMS") > > > MegaTransferObject(other_HasDtvDiscountRequest == false) > > > then > > > menu.add(new > > > String[]{Constants.SERVICE_ASSURANCE_TREE_MENU_DSL, > > > Constants.SERVICE_ASSURANCE_MENU_DTV_DISCOUNT_REQUEST}); > > > end > > > > > > case 3: rule fired > > > > > > rule "dtv_discount_request" > > > when > > > megaTO:MegaTransferObject(other_AccountType == "RMS") > > > megaTO:MegaTransferObject(other_HasDtvDiscountRequest == > false) > > > then > > > menu.add(new > > > String[]{Constants.SERVICE_ASSURANCE_TREE_MENU_DSL, > > > Constants.SERVICE_ASSURANCE_MENU_DTV_DISCOUNT_REQUEST}); > > > end > > > > > > i really dont get it... > > > i must not be getting something... > > > help... > > > > > > > > > Joel G. Rivera-Gonzalez > > > PRT > > > > > > "The first 90% of a project takes 90% of the time, the last 10% takes > > > the other 90% of the time" - Murphy's Law > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > From: Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com&gt; > > > To: Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 7:26:35 AM > > > Subject: Re: [rules-users] About String..."==" same as ".equals"? > > > > > > > > > Joel, > > > > > > This is the correct syntax and it works (at least we didn't get a > > > report for it not working yet): > > > > > > Object(variable == Constants.value) > > > > > > Can you please elaborate about the problem you are having in order > > > for us to help solving it? If it is a bug we need to fix. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Edson > > > > > > Joel G. Rivera-González wrote: > > > > > > > most (if not all) of my rules will have conditions like this: > > > > Object(variable == Constants.value) > > > > this is not working... > > > > BUT if i change the Constants.value to corresponding value from the > > > > constants class it will work... > > > > is there any other way other than this Object(a:variable-> > > > > (a.equals(Constants.value)) to do it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Joel G. Rivera-Gonzalez > > > > PRT > > > > > > > > "The first 90% of a project takes 90% of the time, the last 10% > takes > > > > the other 90% of the time" - Murphy's Law > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >rules-users mailing list > > > &gt;rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > > >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Edson Tirelli > > > Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer > > > Office: +55 11 3124-6000 > > > Mobile: +55 11 9218-4151 > > > JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com <http://www.jboss.com> > <http://www.jboss.com> <http://www.jboss.com> > > <http://www.jboss.com> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > rules-users mailing list > > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > >rules-users mailing list > > &gt;rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Edson Tirelli > > Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer > > Office: +55 11 3124-6000 > > Mobile: +55 11 9218-4151 > > JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com <http://www.jboss.com> <http://www.jboss.com> > <http://www.jboss.com> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-users mailing list > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >_______________________________________________ > >rules-users mailing list > &gt;rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > > -- > Edson Tirelli > Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer > Office: +55 11 3124-6000 > Mobile: +55 11 9218-4151 > JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com <http://www.jboss.com> <http://www.jboss.com> > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >rules-users mailing list &gt;rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > -- Edson Tirelli Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer Office: +55 11 3124-6000 Mobile: +55 11 9218-4151 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com <http://www.jboss.com> _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users