On 16/01/2013, sunil.ss <sunil.ss(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, As of today we are using Drools 2.0, where we are converting the
xml in
to java objects before validating by drools engine. Can we send xml
directly
to Drools 5.2 or higher and validate directly instead of conversion from
xml
to java.
Technically speaking: yes, you can insert org.w3c.dom objects from a
XML DOM tree as facts into working memory and reason with them.
But this would mean that you'd have to rewrite all of your rules.
Also, see a very recent thread on the rules-users list.
Also, please share if there are any design considerations while
migrating from drools 2.0 to 5.2 or higher. Which version is stable and
all.
For migrating the features available in 2.0 any 5.x should do, e.g., 5.5.0
-W
Regards, Sunil S
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Can-drool-engine-validate-on-xml-input-...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users