Creating a KnowledgeBase using a KnowledgeAgent, KnowledgeAgentConfiguration and KnowledgeBaseConfiguration
by Tina Vießmann
Hi,
I want to create a KnowledgeBase using stream processing mode, getting
its resources from an change-set xml and getting the updated when
resources are changed. So far I'm aware I need a KnowledgeAgent and a
configuration for the kagent and the kbase.
My code is:
// create knowledge base
// knowledge base configuration
KnowledgeBaseConfiguration kbaseConf =
KnowledgeBaseFactory.newKnowledgeBaseConfiguration();
kbaseConf.setOption(EventProcessingOption.STREAM);
// knowledge base
KnowledgeBase kbase = KnowledgeBaseFactory.newKnowledgeBase(kbaseConf);
// create knowledge agent
// create knowledge agent configuration
KnowledgeAgentConfiguration kagentConf =
KnowledgeAgentFactory.newKnowledgeAgentConfiguration();
//enable incremental knowledge base build
kagentConf.setProperty("drools.agent.newInstance", "false");
//create knowledge agent
KnowledgeAgent kagent =
KnowledgeAgentFactory.newKnowledgeAgent("AITS CEP Engine Agent",
kbase, kagentConf);
// apply change-set XML to knowledge agent
kagent.applyChangeSet(ResourceFactory.newClassPathResource("changeset.xml"));
// get updated knowledge base object
kbase = kagent.getKnowledgeBase();
// create session
session = kbase.newStatefulKnowledgeSession();
Can it be done in a more compact way?
Thank you! :)
Tina
15 years, 10 months
Drools Bug: Custom Operator with Maps results in Mvel Error
by Uday Kodukula
Hello,
I'm not sure if this is a bug, but I'd like to check with the Drools experts
to see if it is.
I noticed this when creating my custom operator, which doesn't appear to
recognize values from Maps, but works fine with non Map based values.
I have created a custom comparison operator which takes in a parameter to
determine how to execute the comparison logic.
So for example, I am able to do the following:
id udaycompare[gt] 1
where id is an integer. So for the sake of clarity this is equivalent to "id
> 1".
Now, when I try to extract an integer from a HashMap called myMap, who has
an integer value for the key "someKey", I get an error raised by MVEL:
myMap["someKey"] udaycompare[gt] 1
Error thrown:
Unable to determine the used declarations.
[Error: unknown class or illegal statement: org.mvel2.ParserContext@1d87b85]
[Near : {... myMap["someKey"] udaycompare ....}]
^
It appears that Mvel doesn't like getting values from HashMap when working
with custom operators. I also tried an alternate way of getting that key
from the map as follows:
myMap.someKey udaycompare[gt] 1
but i still get the same error.
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Uday
--
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Bug-Custom-Ope...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
15 years, 10 months
Question about Drools Spring, StatelessKnowledgeSession and globals
by Patrick van Kann
Hello,
I've been trying out the Spring integration package in Drools 5.1.1 and it
works really well, but I have run into one issue I can't figure out.
I've defined 2 knowledge sessions from the same knowledge base in the app
context - one stateless, one stateful but otherwise identical. They both
refer to a collaborator defined as a bean in the app context which is to be
used as a global in my rules. This is just an excerpt of my full Spring
context, the kbase definition itself is not an issue.
<bean id="applicantDao" class="com.acme.app.dao.impl.ApplicantDaoImpl" />
<drools:ksession id="statelessKSession" type="stateless"
name="statelessKSession" kbase="kbase">
<drools:script>
<drools:set-global identifier="applicantDao" ref="applicantDao" />
</drools:script>
</drools:ksession>
<drools:ksession id="statefulKSession" type="stateful"
name="statefulKSession" kbase="kbase">
<drools:script>
<drools:set-global identifier="applicantDao" ref="applicantDao" />
</drools:script>
</drools:ksession>
The issue is that this configuration works for the stateful but not the
stateless session, in the sense that the stateful session appears to have a
valid reference to the applicantDao object in the Globals object but the
stateless session doesn't.
@Test
public void testStatelessGlobal() {
Globals globals = statelessKSession.getGlobals();
Object global = globals.get("applicantDao");
Assert.assertNotNull(global);
}
@Test
public void testStatefulGlobal() {
Globals globals = statefulKSession.getGlobals();
Object global = globals.get("applicantDao");
Assert.assertNotNull(global);
}
The first test fails (the global variable is null) but the second passes. No
errors are thrown by Drools during the setup of the Spring container.
What am I doing wrong? Should I be able to define globals in this way for
stateless sessions? The XSD seems to indicate this is a valid configuration,
but it just doesn't work.
Is anyone else working with the Spring integration that can point out my
error here?
Many thanks,
Patrick
15 years, 10 months
no visitor implementation for : class org.drools.rule.TypeDeclaration
by Tina Vießmann
Hi,
I'm getting a two red highlighted outputs in eclipse if I modify my
rules file during run time. Besides that the modifications seem to work.
What does it mean?
The full output I get when the resource change is detected is listed
below. The bold lines are the concerned ones.
Thanks for any help! :)
Tina
[2010:08:235 21:08:296:debug] ResourceChangeScanner attempt to scan 1
resources
[2010:08:235 21:08:296:debug] ResourceChangeScanner modified
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl'] : 1282559206875 :
1282591705000
[2010:08:235 21:08:296:debug] ResourceChangeNotification received
ChangeSet notification
[2010:08:235 21:08:296:debug] ResourceChangeScanner thread is waiting
for 10 seconds.
[2010:08:235 21:08:296:debug] ResourceChangeNotification processing
ChangeSet
[2010:08:235 21:08:296:debug] ResourceChangeNotification ChangeSet
modified resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl'] for
listener=org.drools.agent.impl.KnowledgeAgentImpl@b40ec4
[2010:08:235 21:08:296:debug] KnowledgeAgent received ChangeSet changed
notification
[2010:08:235 21:08:296:info] KnowledgeAgent applying ChangeSet
[2010:08:235 21:08:296:debug] KnowledgeAgent removing mappings for
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl'] with unsubscribe=true
[2010:08:235 21:08:296:debug] KnowledgeAgent notifier unsubscribing to
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl']
[2010:08:235 21:08:296:debug] ResourceChangeNotification unsubscribing
listener=org.drools.agent.impl.KnowledgeAgentImpl@b40ec4 to
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl']
[2010:08:235 21:08:296:debug] ResourceChangeScanner unsubcribing
notifier=org.drools.io.impl.ResourceChangeNotifierImpl@13576a2 to
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl']
[2010:08:235 21:08:296:debug] ResourceChangeScanner
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl'] now has no subscribers
[2010:08:235 21:08:296:debug] KnowledgeAgent rebuilding KnowledgeBase
using ChangeSet
[2010:08:235 21:08:296:info] KnowledgeAgent performing an incremental
build of the ChangeSet
[2010:08:235 21:08:296:debug] ResourceChangeNotification thread is
waiting for queue update
[INFO ] 21:30:10,375 [main] "Event retracted." (DRL Logger)
[2010:08:235 21:08:453:debug] KnowledgeAgent: Diffing:
[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl']
[INFO ] 21:30:10,453 [main] "Event retracted." (DRL Logger)
[2010:08:235 21:08:500:debug] BinaryResourceDiffProducerImpl: [Rule
name=delete parameter values, agendaGroup=MAIN, salience=0,
no-loop=false] is not present anymore. Adding to removed list.
[2010:08:235 21:08:500:debug] BinaryResourceDiffProducerImpl:
org.drools.rule.Function@67fe80 did change. Marking as removed so it new
version could be added later.
[2010:08:235 21:08:500:debug] BinaryResourceDiffProducerImpl: Comparing
[Rule name=Warning threshold exceeded to many times, agendaGroup=MAIN,
salience=0, no-loop=false] against [Rule name=Warning threshold exceeded
to many times, agendaGroup=MAIN, salience=0, no-loop=false]
*no visitor implementation for : class org.drools.rule.TypeDeclaration :
org.drools.rule.TypeDeclaration@95f290
no visitor implementation for : class org.drools.rule.TypeDeclaration :
org.drools.rule.TypeDeclaration@bfd66a*
[2010:08:235 21:08:546:debug] BinaryResourceDiffProducerImpl: [Rule
name=Warning threshold exceeded to many times, agendaGroup=MAIN,
salience=0, no-loop=false] didn't change. Removing from diff package and
adding it to unmodified list.
[2010:08:235 21:08:546:debug] BinaryResourceDiffProducerImpl: Comparing
[Rule name=Insert Watcher Into Knowledge Base, agendaGroup=MAIN,
salience=0, no-loop=false] against [Rule name=Insert Watcher Into
Knowledge Base, agendaGroup=MAIN, salience=0, no-loop=false]
[2010:08:235 21:08:546:debug] BinaryResourceDiffProducerImpl: The rules
have different LHS
[2010:08:235 21:08:546:debug] BinaryResourceDiffProducerImpl: Comparing
[Rule name=Add Event to Watcher Set, agendaGroup=MAIN, salience=0,
no-loop=false] against [Rule name=Add Event to Watcher Set,
agendaGroup=MAIN, salience=0, no-loop=false]
[2010:08:235 21:08:546:debug] BinaryResourceDiffProducerImpl: The rules
have different LHS
[2010:08:235 21:08:546:debug] KnowledgeAgent: Removing: [Rule
name=delete parameter values, agendaGroup=MAIN, salience=0, no-loop=false]
[2010:08:235 21:08:546:debug] KnowledgeAgent removing Rule=[Rule
name=delete parameter values, agendaGroup=MAIN, salience=0,
no-loop=false] from package=net.eads.astrium.aits.cep.rules
[2010:08:235 21:08:546:debug] KnowledgeAgent: Removing:
org.drools.rule.Function@67fe80
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] KnowledgeAgent mapping
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl'] to
KnowledgeDefinition=[Rule name=Warning threshold exceeded to many times,
agendaGroup=MAIN, salience=0, no-loop=false]
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] KnowledgeAgent obtaining pkg
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl']
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] KnowledgeAgent mapping
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl'] to
KnowledgeDefinition=[Rule name=Insert Watcher Into Knowledge Base,
agendaGroup=MAIN, salience=0, no-loop=false]
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] KnowledgeAgent notifier subscribing to
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl']
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] ResourceChangeNotification subscribing
listener=org.drools.agent.impl.KnowledgeAgentImpl@b40ec4 to
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl']
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] ResourceChangeScanner subcribing
notifier=org.drools.io.impl.ResourceChangeNotifierImpl@13576a2 to
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl']
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] KnowledgeAgent mapping
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl'] to
KnowledgeDefinition=[Rule name=Add Event to Watcher Set,
agendaGroup=MAIN, salience=0, no-loop=false]
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] KnowledgeAgent notifier subscribing to
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl']
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] ResourceChangeNotification subscribing
listener=org.drools.agent.impl.KnowledgeAgentImpl@b40ec4 to
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl']
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] KnowledgeAgent mapping
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl'] to
KnowledgeDefinition=org.drools.rule.TypeDeclaration@17dff15
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] KnowledgeAgent notifier subscribing to
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl']
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] ResourceChangeNotification subscribing
listener=org.drools.agent.impl.KnowledgeAgentImpl@b40ec4 to
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl']
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] KnowledgeAgent mapping
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl'] to
KnowledgeDefinition=org.drools.rule.TypeDeclaration@f5cbda
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] KnowledgeAgent notifier subscribing to
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl']
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] ResourceChangeNotification subscribing
listener=org.drools.agent.impl.KnowledgeAgentImpl@b40ec4 to
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl']
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] KnowledgeAgent mapping
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl'] to
KnowledgeDefinition=org.drools.rule.Function@11a59ce
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] KnowledgeAgent notifier subscribing to
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl']
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] ResourceChangeNotification subscribing
listener=org.drools.agent.impl.KnowledgeAgentImpl@b40ec4 to
resource=[ClassPathResource path='testRule.drl']
[2010:08:235 21:08:562:debug] KnowledgeAgent adding
KnowledgeDefinitionsPackage net.eads.astrium.aits.cep.rules
[2010:08:235 21:08:578:info] KnowledgeAgent incremental build of
KnowledgeBase finished and in use
[2010:08:235 21:08:578:debug] KnowledgeAgent finished rebuilding
KnowledgeBase using ChangeSet
15 years, 10 months
enabling rules based on interval events
by Jaroslav Pullmann
Dear all,
I am wondering whether and how the rule activation might be contextualized
in respect to the existence of a time slot signalled via interval events (with a
non-null duration). The static rule attributes (date-effective, date-expires) are
not applicable here, neither is the temporal operator "during", which requires
the existence of an explicit second event. The following approach demonstrates the
case but does not work (return value restrictions are not allowed to invoke time-
dependent functions):
rule "active time slot"
when
// partial condition met when there is a "live"/ongoing IntervalEvent "foo"
$system : System()
$ongoing: IntervalEvent( id == "foo", $system.currentTimeMillis <= ( msecstart + msecdur ) )
... further patterns
then
...
end
Many thanks for your suggestions!
Jaro
15 years, 10 months
event declaration using fqn
by Samuli Saarinen
Hi,
I'm trying to create event declaration using fqn in the declaration but
for some reason it doesn't work. I have the following rule:
package com.test.pkg
declare com.test.Event1
@role(event)
@expires(2s)
end
compiling it produces the following error:
[6,11]: [ERR 103] Line 6:11 rule 'end_key' failed predicate:
{(validateIdentifierKey(DroolsSoftKeywords.END))}? in com
But if I change it as follows:
package com.test.pkg
import com.test.Event1
declare Event1
@role(event)
@expires(2s)
end
Everything works as expected...
From what I've read from the users guide it should work in both cases
but am I missing something obvious here or is this possibly a bug?
I'm using Drools 5.1.0 but tested this with 5.1.1 also
Cheers,
Samuli
--
Remion Oy Etävalvontajärjestelmät liiketoiminnan
Samuli Saarinen tehostamiseen
gsm +358 (0)50 3560075
fax +358 (0)3 2125064 www.remion.com
15 years, 11 months
How to get JmsMessenger to enlist in XA transactions when receiving?
by Robert (rob3c)
Hi, I'm trying to test use of Drools pipeline (5.1.0.M2) with XA
transactions. I'd like the transaction to cover receipt of the JMS message
by JmsMessenger as well as successful addition of facts into the ksession,
flows interaction, etc., based on the message content.
I'm using the Bitronix transaction manager, Hibernate for persistence to a
SqlServer database via MS JDBC driver, and ActiveMQ for JMS. I have ActiveMQ
running in a separate process, and I'm doing everything else in a simple
standalone java app.
When not configured for XA, everything works fine. However, when configured
for XA, the log shows that the JMS resource is not enlisting in the
transaction. Hibernate enlists ok.
Before I go into further configuration detail, can anyone tell me if this is
even possible using the standard pipeline JMS functionality? Or will this
require custom code? I've searched extensively for docs or samples
discussing this, but haven't found any specifically using XA with the
pipeline JMS receiver. Any help would be greatly appreciated! :)
Thanks in advance,
Robert (rob3c)
15 years, 11 months
Problems with globals in bpmn-flows
by Mahler, Björn
Hello dear list,
I currently have problems to access global variables in a drools 5.1 bpmn rule-flow. I have a script-task at the end of my process-flow in which I want to call a method of an "external" service. I instantiated the service and set it as global in the ksession before starting the process. In the script-task I add global x.y.z.MyService myService with the same name as setted before and call the object with the method with script-type mvel/java: myService.xyz();
Is this the right way doing this? Because I'm receiving the error-message "cannot access variable with name 'myService'" or similar (can't remember exactly).
When adding the service as a "process variable" in the model and then starting the process, I can access this variable in the script-task... but - I think using globals would be much nicer for accessing the service in some of my rules in the same way under the same variable.
After all I also don't know how to access modified process-variables in my task. For example if I change some object in a rule-task before and in a script-task later I want to call a service with the modified object... do I have to read a process variable in the rule, modify it and then in the script-task I access the process-variable or could I access the changed object in the working-memory in the script-task as well? Like or similar because this is just rule-style:
when
$o : MyObject (withMyChangedParameter == 'x')
then
service.myMethod($o);
TIA
Björn
Diese E-Mail kann vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen enthalten.
Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail.
Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet.
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.
Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
15 years, 11 months
