fireAllRules performance
by sjoo822
I have several thousand objects that gets inserted into a statefull knowledge
session as show below:
for (Item item : itemList)
{
session.insert(item);
}
session.fireAllRules();
Assuming that all the conditions in the rules only concern with one item at
a time, will there be a big performance difference if I changed the above to
as shown below?
for (Item item : itemList)
{
session.insert(item);
session.fireAllRules();
}
--
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/fireAllRules-performa...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
16 years
ArrayList in Guvnor 5.1 M2
by james corrigan
Hi All
I have built the following rule in version 5.0 with no errors:
rule "When average temperature is greater than 19"
lock-on-active true
when
$t : ArrayList() from
collect(Temperature()) //store all temperature
objects in an arraylist
$average: Number(doubleValue>19) from
accumulate(Temperature($val:value),average($val))
//calculate the average temperature
$f : ArrayList() from collect(Fan())
then
System.out.println($average);
turnOnFans($f); //function -> send arraylist of fan objects to
function
end
but when i try to build in version 5.1 i get a
java.lang.ArrayStoreException.
Any help much appreciated.
Kind regards,
James.
16 years, 1 month
Re: [rules-users] StackOverflowError when serializing KnowledgeBase
by Andargor
Sorry, forgot to mention, I have tried 5.1.0M1, and yesterday's snapshot.
--- On Thu, 7/22/10, Andargor <andargor(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: Andargor <andargor(a)yahoo.com>
> Subject: StackOverflowError when serializing KnowledgeBase
> To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> Date: Thursday, July 22, 2010, 8:10 PM
> Hello,
>
> After adding a few hundred rules, and with the same code,
> KnowledgeBase serialization has started to generate
> StackOverflowError. I have increased the VM stack size as a
> workaround, but I was hoping to implement something more
> robust.
>
> I specifically need to serialize the KnowledgeBase, and not
> the session.
>
> I'm using this code:
>
> private void dumpKnowledgeBase(String file,
> KnowledgeBase kbase) {
> try {
>
> FileOutputStream ostream = new
> FileOutputStream(file);
>
> DroolsObjectOutputStream p = new
> DroolsObjectOutputStream(ostream);
>
> p.writeObject(kbase);
>
> p.flush();
>
> ostream.close();
> }
> catch
> (Exception e) {
>
> System.err.println(e);
>
> e.printStackTrace();
>
> System.err.println("Could not write
> knowledge base "+file);
> }
> }
>
>
> This is due to writeObject recursion? Any ideas?
>
> A.
>
>
>
>
16 years, 1 month
Detecting an expired Event
by Jean-Philippe Steinmetz
Hello everyone,
I'm working on a Drools system that uses stream mode to handle incoming
events from clients and I am trying to adapt some existing code to
Drools. I'm unsure if it's fully applicable but I'm hoping someone can
shed light on to it.
My current execution path is...
1. Client generates an event
2. Server receives event and places it into a timer for a
specified time.
3. When the timer is up the server notifies the client.
>From what I can see you can determine if event A occurs after event B
but I don't see any way that lets you know when event B finishes on its
own. Is this even possible? Thanks.
Cheers,
Jean-Philippe
16 years, 1 month
Using Drools for Business Rules Validation
by pm-lemos
Hi everybody,
I've started reading about Drools and I quite didn't understand if it's
appropriate for a work I want to do...
I'm posting this in order to get some feedback about what other people may
think about it.
So heres what I need:
I need to develop some sort of application (A) to be used with in order to a
"client" to write a bunch of rules he wants a given software application (B)
to comply with. And as a client I want him to be able to write these rules
in an easy way (proximately to a natural language).
After those rules are defined, I want to run a bunch of processing over
those rules in order to interpret them having in consideration my software
application (B) and execute (for each rule) some kind of validation over
that same software application (B). Ideally those methods will return a
result for the "A" application.
(If need explanations, or more details... just ask)
Thanks in advance.
Pedro
--
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Using-Drools-for-Busi...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
16 years, 1 month
Help regrading branching of call to a rule depending upon date
by Swapnil Sawant
Hi,
I am evaluating Drool Gunvor for to implement Rules for some finance related functionality.
I need help from users to implement following scenario is Drools-Guvnor
I have created simple Rule to Calculate House Rent Allowance i.e. HRA as
HRA = 0.12 * Basic salary .(Basic will come as Input Parameter).
This rule is valid from e.g. 01-Jan-2005 to 31-July-2010 as HRA rule is changed from 1st Aug 2010
I will have to create new Rule for HRA Rule with new formula as
HRA = 0.15 * Basic salary .(Basic will come as Input Parameter).
This rule is valid from 01-Aug-2010 to 01-Aug-2999
>From 1st Aug HRA should be calculated using New Rule. But at the same time if any Arrears to be calculated(back dated calculation) depending on the date old HRA rule should be applicable.
Can I achieve this in Gunor Drool? I could achieve first half by specifying date-expires . But I am not able to achieve second half i.e. referring old rule depending on the date. I would appreciate help to solve this problem .
Thanks in advance.
Swapnil Sawant
________________________________
This Email may contain confidential or privileged information for the intended recipient (s) If you are not the intended recipient, please do not use or disseminate the information, notify the sender and delete it from your system.
______________________________________________________________________
16 years, 1 month
Query on Performance Improvement in Drools 5 while dealing with huge data
by senthij
Hi There,
We are using Drools 5 in our project, the requirement was to have huge
database, the data is being fetched from DB and inserted into drools working
memory.
For eg:
Cell - 50k
ExternalCell - 50k
CellRelation - 2500000
Topology hiearchy:
------------------------
-Subnetwork
- PLMN (Contained in Subnetwork)
- RNC (Contained in PLMN)
- Cells (Contained in RNC)
Problem statement:
Check if bidirectional relation not exist between cells in different
subnetwork.
How to prove?
Prove that,
First check:
- CellObA and ExternalCellObB in subnetwork 1, both are related using
CellRelationX. - Unidirectional
note: CellObA will have List property contains all ExternalCellOb names,
so ExternalCellObB name should be part of List if
there is an CellRelation relating CellObA and ExternalCellObB.
Second check:
- CellObB and ExternalCellObA in subnetwork 2, both are related using
CellRelationY. - Unidirectional (inturn proves that bi-directional relation
exist)
note: CellObB will have List property contains all ExternalCellOb names,
so similarly ExternalCellObA should be part of List if
there is an CellRelation relating CellObB and ExternalCellObA.
Check if there is missing/no relation exist between CellObB and
ExteranlCellObA.
Cell table has oneToMany relation to CellRelation table. We are using
eclipselink for ORM, since Cell and CellRelation tables are related, while
reteriving Cell, CellRelation are also part of the it (using fetch.type =
LAZY). Since Cell table is kind of master table, we are creating the
required objects by from cell entities and inserting the newly created
objects into working memory.
Cell table contains master data and ExternalCell table contains proxy
(duplicate copy of master) data.
Mapping from Entities to Objects
Entity - Objects
----------------------------------
Cell - CellOb
ExternalCell - ExternalCellOb
CellRelation - CellRelation
CellOb & ExternalCellOb contains following attributes which are used for
comparison.
- mcc,mnc,rncId,cellId and nodeId are all of type integer used for
comparsion.
- mcc, mnc, rncId and cellId are used to uniquely identify CellOb and its
ExternalCellOb through object equality. These fours attributes are used in
overrided equals() and hashcode() method.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule file:
rule "Cell Selection Rule"
salience 50
dialect "java"
when
$ucell:CellOb() from TopologyService.getInstance().getCellObs()
then
insert($ucell); // inserts each CellOb into working memory.
end
rule "External Cell Selection Rule"
salience 49
dialect "java"
when
$extucell:ExternalCellOb() from
TopologyService.getInstance().getExternalCellObs()
then
insert($extucell); // inserts each ExternalCellOb into working memory.
end
rule "Bidirectional Relations Evaluation Rule"
salience 10
dialect "java"
when
//Takes ExternalCellObB from Subnetwork 1
$extuccell : ExternalCellOb(subnetworkMgrId==1)
// Takes CellObA from Subnetwork 1, not matching cgiParam (is
mcc+mnc+rncId+cellId) of ExternalCellObB, and seeing if there is
CellRelation exist
// between ExternalCellObB and CellObA using contains check
$cell :
CellObA(subnetworkMgrId==$extuccell.subnetworkMgrId,cgiParam!=$extuccell.cgiParam,adjacentCells
contains $extuccell.fdnReverse)
//Takes ExternalCellObA from Subnetwork 2, matching CellObA cgiParam (is
mcc+mnc+rncId+cellId)
$adjextcell : ExternalCellOb (subnetworkMgrId!=$cell.subnetworkMgrId,
cgiParam==$cell.cgiParam)
//Takes CellObB from Subnetwork 2, matching ExternalCellObB, and seeing if
there is no CellRelation exist between CellObB and
//ExternalCellObA
$adjcell : CellOb ( subnetworkMgrId==$adjextcell.subnetworkMgrId,
cgiParam==$extuccell.cgiParam,adjacentCells
not contains $adjextcell.fdnReverse)
then
// FDN format looks like the one mentioned below.
//
SubNetwork=ROOT_OB,SubNetwork=1,Context=01,MElement=1,Rnc=1,Cell=RNC01-104
System.out.println("Missing Cell Relation from " + $cell.getFdn() + " to "
+ $adjcell.getFdn());
end
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tried following and gave performance imporvements after each change:
- Initially, we use to check the following attributes individually, like
mcc, mnc, rncId and cellId but later we combined and it
gave some performance improvements.
- Used subnetworkId to search CellOb/ExternalCellOb with in a appropriate
subnetwork.
- Java string search trick, cellNames are very lengthy but they vary at the
end of the string, so reverse the string and it improved in the
contains/not contains check in the List of strings.
What we wanted to know is from Drools part any scope of improvement/tuning
is still possible to deal with huge data and give much better performance??
Your help and guidance is much appreciated.
Regards,
Senthil Jayakumar
--
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Query-on-Performance-...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
16 years, 1 month
Drools-Guvnor doubt regarding firing of rules
by Pardeep Ruhil
Hi All,
I have a doubt regarding drools-guvnor, as I am going to use Drools-Guvnor and integrate it with my application.
1. Can I make two rules with the same name having different date-expires attributes.
Like depending upon the date the corresponding rule fires.
rule "discount"
date-effective "01-July-2010 12:00:00 AM"
date-expires "26-July-2010 12:00:00 AM"
when
<condition for 10% discount>
then
<result>
rule "discount"
date-effective "01-October-2010 12:00:00 AM"
date-expires "26-October-2010 12:00:00 AM"
when
<condition for 20% discount>
then
<result>
2. Can I fire the rule which are expired programmatically?
Thanks & Regards
Pradeep Ruhil
L& T Infotech
Mahape, Vashi
Mumbai
________________________________
This Email may contain confidential or privileged information for the intended recipient (s) If you are not the intended recipient, please do not use or disseminate the information, notify the sender and delete it from your system.
______________________________________________________________________
16 years, 1 month
CEP Stream Mode
by Jean-Philippe Steinmetz
Hello all,
I'd like to get Drools working in such a way that it is always running
and I can just stream new events into the runtime and have it execute
rules against them. From what I can tell I need to use stream mode in
order to do this. I've got everything set up for how I think it should
work (based on what I can decipher from the documentation) but what's
happening is that I'm never getting a hit on the rules I write. I can
see the event be asserted but nothing happens.
Here is my set up...
KnowledgeBaseConfiguration config =
KnowledgeBaseFactory.newKnowledgeBaseConfiguration();
config.setOption(EventProcessingOption.STREAM);
setKnowledgeBase(KnowledgeBaseFactory.newKnowledgeBase(config));
// Create a knowledge agent to pull load the necessary resources
kagent = KnowledgeAgentFactory.newKnowledgeAgent("MyAgenda",
getKnowledgeBase());
initResources(kagent);
setKnowledgeBase(kagent.getKnowledgeBase());
getSession().addEventListener(new DebugAgendaEventListener());
getSession().addEventListener(new DebugWorkingMemoryEventListener());
And here is how I start up Drools...
thread = new Thread() {
@Override
public void run() {
getSession().fireUntilHalt();
}
};
thread.run();
I then feed events into the engine like this...
WorkingMemoryEntryPoint stream =
getSession().getWorkingMemoryEntryPoint(origin);
stream.insert(event);
I'm obviously missing something in my setup. Any help on understanding
how this is supposed to work is greatly appreciated. Again, the goal
here is to get Drools in a state that is always running so I can pipe in
events to it and have rules execute against them.
Jean-Philippe
16 years, 1 month
