Re: [rules-users] What should I insert into the working memory?

-----Original Message----- From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users- bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Chris Selwyn Sent: 28 November 2010 11:39 To: Drools users Subject: [rules-users] What should I insert into the working memory? I am working on a project that is using Drools to perform validation of hierarchical XML messages. So I have passed the XSDs through JAXB and have a set of interrelated Java objects. One of these objects (naturally) represents the root of the messages and the others represent the intermediate and leaf nodes of the message. My question is: Should I traverse the tree and insert each object into the working memory or should I just insert the root object into the working memory? If I insert each object into the memory then I have a lot of flexibility about how I write my rules... I can start by focussing on the particular part of the message that I want to detect an error in. However, I then have to perform a whole bunch of "joining" clauses to correctly "connect up" to the other objects in the working memory. (This is how I am doing it at the moment... I have a mechanism that uses the Java Introspector. It identifies by package name which parts of the data model get inserted into the WM) On the other hand, I could just insert the root object into the WM. This means that I would have to write really complicated where clauses on the root object but very much simplifies the WM loading process. All of the examples that I have seen have a very simple flat (non-hierarchical) structure that don't really give a hint as to what a "best practice" might be. Any suggestions/insights welcome :-) Chris Selwyn _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users