Re: [rules-users] Dynamic updates of stateful sessions
@Wolfgang, maybe I need to update the documentation to explicitly inform
about this behavior :). The agent doesn't make anything special to sync the
sessions with the kbase. If you add a rule by hand to an existing kbase, all
the session from this kbase will automatically detect the changes.
Now I'm working in a helper class to create and apply change-set in a
programatic way. So if you don't want kbases to be automatically modified
when a resource chages, you can use this helper class.
Best Regards,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
- Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
2011/4/20 Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>
2011/4/20 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com>
> @Wolfgang: if you are using drools.agent.newInstance=true (the default
> configuration), then whenever a change-set is applied, either because you
> explicitly force the agent to do so, or because a monitored resource
> changes, the kbase inside the agent is thrown away an a new kbase is
> created. So you need to get the kbase from the agent and retrieve a fresh
> session from it.
> You can confirm this behavior in this set of tests:
>
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/blob/master/drools-compiler/src/test...
>
> But, if you are using drools.agent.newInstance=false the internal kbase
> (and each stateful session you got from it) is refreshed when a change-set
> is applied.
>
>
Would you please point me to the doc where it says "and each stateful
session ... is refreshed"?
If true, this were an extremely risky operation. Consider a stateful
session whizzing along and - smack! - rules change right in the middle of a
sequence of firings. Shudder.
-W
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 3.5 KB)