Re: [rules-users] Possible bug

Maybe yes, advice is generic but I looked at source code and from what I see iteration is going through some internal cache which is maybe concurrently modified not through items of my Hash. for ( ObjectTypeNode node : ruleBase.getRete().getObjectTypeNodes( this.entryPoint ).values() ) { Anyway modifying fact will be wrong idea ;-). Pavel On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:36 PM, PAYET, Manuel <manuel.payet(a)capgemini.com&gt; wrote: > My last message presumes that you inserted a Map fact, was I wrong? > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] De la part de Pavel Tavoda > Envoyé : lundi 28 juin 2010 15:29 > À : Rules Users List > Objet : [rules-users] Possible bug > > Hello, > we are using official 5.0 release and sometimes (very rarely) we get following error: > java.util.ConcurrentModificationException > at java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.nextEntry(HashMap.java:793) > at java.util.HashMap$ValueIterator.next(HashMap.java:822) > at org.drools.reteoo.ClassObjectTypeConf.getMatchingObjectTypes(ClassObjectTypeConf.java:171) > at org.drools.reteoo.ClassObjectTypeConf.getObjectTypeNodes(ClassObjectTypeConf.java:163) > at org.drools.reteoo.EntryPointNode.assertObject(EntryPointNode.java:143) > at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1046) > at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1001) > at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:788) > at org.drools.process.command.InsertObjectCommand.execute(InsertObjectCommand.java:22) > at org.drools.process.command.InsertObjectCommand.execute(InsertObjectCommand.java:7) > at org.drools.runtime.impl.BatchExecutionImpl.execute(BatchExecutionImpl.java:23) > at org.drools.runtime.impl.BatchExecutionImpl.execute(BatchExecutionImpl.java:9) > at org.drools.impl.StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl.execute(StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:225) > at org.fornax.cartridges.sculptor.framework.drools.DroolsAdvice.applyCompanyPolicy(DroolsAdvice.java:150) > > We are using AspectJ advice for starting rule evaluation for every service call. Hope we are doing everything right in code. Full source code of advice can be found at: > http://fisheye3.atlassian.com/browse/fornax/trunk/cartridges/sculptor/for... > > Regards > > Pavel > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > > This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is > intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to > read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message > in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users