Re: [rules-users] Executing rules actions asynchronously

My thinking is that when the Web Service returns (asynchronously through JMS or by an extra thread that you created) to insert the result into the memory perhaps as a generic reply object so other rules will fire when the object is inserted, depending of course on the contents of the reply object. You will have to use a stateful session for this to work and I think that you will have to keep calling the fireAllRules() after each returning Web Service reply is inserted into the working memory. About JMS it is a much better alternative of creating asynchronous requests than creating your own threads, as you will find support for Thread Pooling, Transactions, Priority queues etc. depending on the JMS implementation. Of course you can achieve the same with creating your own threads but I think it will be a lot of work. Spyros Spyros Sakellariou Principal Product Manager - Solution Architect Markopoulo Ave. 19002 Paiania Athens, Greece Tel. +30 210 667 9874 Mob. +30 694 700 7984 email ssake(a)intracom.gr -----Original Message----- From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Vieira Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 5:46 PM To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] Executing rules actions asynchronously Hi Spyros, Well, i tried launching a thread for each Web Service call, and it works ok... but i need to use the return of Web Service in the right side of the rule to, for example, insert another fact... so, i have to wait for the execution... What i want is to execute a set of actions (in the right side of a rule) in a different thread. But i will look for JMS to see capabilities, and to see if fit my purposes. Thx for the help Regards Carlos V. Spyros Sakellariou wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > I don't know if this is possible in drools but an alternative is instead > of > calling web services synchronously from drools, to call them > asynchronously > using JMS. That way you don't have to wait for each service to return. > > Spyros > > > -----Original Message----- > From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org > [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Vieira > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 5:02 PM > To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > Subject: [rules-users] Executing rules actions asynchronously > > Hi, > > I'm facing a situation, that maybe some of you just solved out in the > past. > I need that the execution of matched rules ( Activations that are > already in the Agenda, referencing those rules) is done asynchronously. > > In more detail, i need that each set of actions owned by two or more > rules, runs in a separated thread. > The problem here is that i need to invoke external Web Services in rule > actions.... well, some Web Services may take too long to return > something, what makes the other actions of other rules to wait for > this... what is not an expected behavior... > > Any one knows if jboss rules already support this kind of approach? If > not, any one has passed through this? > Accessing to the mechanism of firing individual rules seems to be the > best way, overriding a couple of classes..... how can i fire just one > rule with jboss rules? is this the best choice? > > Well, if anyone has any idea, it would be nice > > Regards > Carlos V. > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users