Re: [rules-users] JTA question

Kris, Thanks again for your help with this! If you want to help, you could provide native support for the TransactionSynchronizationRegistry as an alternative to TransactionManager. We created a new issue for that here: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-2322 Thanks, Allen -----Original Message----- From: Kris Verlaenen [mailto:kris.verlaenen@cs.kuleuven.be] Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 10:10 AM To: Rules Users List; Allen Day Subject: Re: [rules-users] JTA question Quoting Allen Day <DayAK(a)ldschurch.org&gt;: No, this class handles the transaction management. Sure, we use a provider strategy for getting the actual implementation. So you can use JPAKnowledgeService.setJPAKnowledgeServiceProvider to configure another provider. If you look at JPAKnowledgeServiceProviderImpl, it simply uses a property to specify the command service, so your own provider impl. should change that to use your custom implementation: props.setProperty( "drools.commandService", "org.drools.persistence.session.SingleSessionCommandService" ); Let us know how it goes, or if there is anything we could improve in our implementation to make this easier for you. Kris Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.