Re: [rules-users] why define the returnedProcessor twice
Hi,
Sorry I have not checked the source code.
I just download the binaries from http://download.jboss.org/drools/release
I decompile the class to check it.
maybe something wrong with the decompiler?
I should check the source file, sorry for the trouble!
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/why-define-the-returnedProcessor-twice-...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.