Re: [rules-users] Help with MR3

Our server creates hundreds of stateful rule sessions concurrently. Each created rule seesion is specific to a thread. We did not encounter any memory problems with the previous version. As I've said, it's difficult (actually, impossible) for me to provide you with a self contained example since the drl is complicated and contains dozens of complex objects. However, I am ready to provide you with any information that can help us in that manner. I've also mentioned in the earlier threads the concurrency problem I've encountered with AbstractHashTable. Can this has something to do with it? On 7/4/07, *Mark Proctor* <mproctor(a)codehaus.org <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote: I don't beleive there is anything in 4.0 that is going to cause such quick loss of permgen. Can you create a self contained example that illustrates this behaviour? So we can reproduce this? Mark s erel wrote: > We've tried to increase the permGen to 256mb. It did not help and > the space run out really fast. > Regarding MVEL, is turning code generation off something that can > (or will) be done with a configuration parameter/factory method > or do I need to track down all the places in the code? > > We did not experience such memory behavior with the previous > version we used (3.06) when running the same tests. > Bugs in 3.06 (no longer present in 4M3) are forcing us to upgrade. > > Is there another reason for such behaviour? > Should we wait for release candidate? > > > On 7/4/07, *Mark Proctor* <mproctor(a)codehaus.org > <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote: > > increase your perm gen space,or use the MVEL dialect with > code generation off. > > > Mark > s erel wrote: >> Hello, >> >> During capacity tests we've received permGen OOM >> exception. The occupied space in the permGen area increases >> rapidly. Any opinions? >> >> >> On 7/3/07, *s erel* <erelsagi(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:erelsagi@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> In our project we are creating a StatefulRuleSession and >> saving it in a per-thread context (i.e. Each thread has >> it's own StatefulRuleSession): >> >> ruleServiceProvider.getRuleRuntime().createRuleSession(contextName, >> properties, RuleRuntime.STATEFUL_SESSION_TYPE); >> >> When a thread session ends, we are calling release on >> the previously created StatefulRuleSession. >> >> >> Changing the following lines: >> >> >> public abstract class AbstractHashTable >> >> >> ... >> >> public Iterator iterator() { >> // if ( this.iterator == null ) { >> // this.iterator = new HashTableIterator( this ); >> // } >> // >> // this.iterator.reset(); >> // return this.iterator; >> >> HashTableIterator iterator = new >> HashTableIterator(this); >> iterator.reset(); >> >> return iterator; >> } >> >> Seems to solve the problem I've encountered. What's your >> opinion? >> >> >> On 7/2/07, *Mark Proctor* <mproctor(a)codehaus.org >> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote: >> >> a working memory should be single threaded, so not >> sure how this could be a race condition? >> >> Mark >> >> s erel wrote: >>> I've done a little debugging. The code fails in the >>> following segment: >>> >>> public static class HashTableIterator >>> ... >>> while ( this.entry == null ) { >>> this.row++; >>> if ( this.row == this.length ) { >>> return null; >>> } >>> this.entry = >>> this.table[this.row]; *// ---> index out of bounds >>> exception* >>> } >>> } >>> >>> this.row has the same value as this.length despite >>> the condition above it. Probably a race condition >>> issue. >>> >>> >>> On 7/2/07, *Mark Proctor* <mproctor(a)codehaus.org >>> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Not really :( >>> >>> In your situation I tend to keep removing rules >>> and data while still making sure the error >>> happens, to get it down to a minimum. Please do >>> try, as this isn't an error that should happen. >>> Or alterntaively you can open drools-core and >>> drools-compiler in eclipse and execuse and >>> debug this yourself - in your situation this >>> might best. you can put in a breakpoint to >>> listen for that particular exception. >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> s erel wrote: >>>> It's hard for me to provide a self contained >>>> project. The drl is long and uses several >>>> business objects. It's the same drl as we've >>>> been using for 306 minus the keyword changes. >>>> Is there anything else i can check or provide >>>> you in order to solve this matter. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> On 7/1/07, *Mark Proctor* >>>> <mproctor(a)codehaus.org >>>> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Can you provide us a self contained >>>> project which creates this error? Unless >>>> we can recreate it, it will be very hard >>>> to track it down. Please attach the >>>> project to a jira and we'll make it a >>>> priority. >>>> >>>> Mark >>>> s erel wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I've just started integrating MR3 into my >>>>> project (I've previously used 3.06). The >>>>> drl compiles and everything seems fine, >>>>> but during >>>>> tests the following exception is thrown >>>>> for time to time: >>>>> >>>>> java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 17 >>>>> at >>>>> org.drools.util.AbstractHashTable$HashTableIterator.next(AbstractHashTable.java:250) >>>>> at >>>>> org.drools.reteoo.Rete$ObjectTypeConf.buildCache(Rete.java:434) >>>>> at >>>>> org.drools.reteoo.Rete$ObjectTypeConf.getObjectTypeNodes(Rete.java:425) >>>>> at >>>>> org.drools.reteoo.Rete.assertObject(Rete.java:172) >>>>> at >>>>> org.drools.reteoo.ReteooRuleBase.assertObject(ReteooRuleBase.java:190) >>>>> at >>>>> org.drools.reteoo.ReteooWorkingMemory$WorkingMemoryReteAssertAction.execute >>>>> (ReteooWorkingMemory.java:163) >>>>> at >>>>> org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.executeQueuedActions(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1135) >>>>> at >>>>> org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:781) >>>>> at >>>>> org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:584) >>>>> at >>>>> org.drools.jsr94.rules.StatefulRuleSessionImpl.addObject(StatefulRuleSessionImpl.java:162) >>>>> >>>>> This only happens during high load tests. >>>>> Can anyone help me? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> rules-users mailing list >>>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rules-users mailing list >>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>>> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rules-users mailing list >>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-users mailing list >>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>> <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-users mailing list >>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users