Re: [rules-users] expert mailing list
On 16/08/2012, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
> +1 to split up the user lists per drools subproject (drools,
guvnor,
> planner). It would reduce and focus the volume of each list.
We can look into this for drools 6.0. Because the "guvnor" name, and what it
is, will probably undergo an overhaul.
Guvnor/Planner is becoming a problem *now*. (I just binned 6 out of 8
emails in this morning's mailbox.)
Drools 6 will probably require entirely new lists, given that the
changes are as hefty and incompatible as one might assume from the
proposals. (Personally, I'll NOT stay on a list where Drools 5.0 and
6.0 aren't separated.)
-W