Why would you need to do that? This flow is logically the same.
rule "my rule"
when
...
then
//Java code to modify fact goes here
insert( fact );
end
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of menada
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:20 PM
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Possibly stupid question... but I have to ask
I meant to insert a fact and immediatly modify it, in the same rule
consequence.
I know you can insert OR modify in a consequence.
I also know that when you modify a fact you actually retract the old one
and
insert a new one with the respective properties set.
So, my question was, can you do something like this ?
rule "my rule"
when
...
then
insert( fact );
modify (fact );
end
Where fact is the same?
And if it's possible, can you give me a simple example?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Possibly-stupid-question-b
ut-I-have-to-ask-tp3207666p3207709.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users