Re: [rules-users] Rules Design Question

What is the timeline for the new release as I might be able to migrate now prior to an official rollout of my product/project. On 4/11/07, Mark Proctor < mproctor(a)codehaus.org&gt; wrote: > > in trunk you can do: > mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, sumCmAndRnr != > $amt1) > > So you'll have to wait till you upgrade to drop the eval. > > Mark > > Ronald R. DiFrango wrote: > > Here is a question though now, I have the following: > > mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, $amt2 : > sumCmAndRnr) > eval($amt1.doubleValue() != $amt2.doubleValue()) > > Is there a way for me to eliminate the eval given that it makes the > rules engine sub-optimal? I guess one strategy is to create two separate > classes to house the results, but man that seems messy. > > On 4/11/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com > wrote: > > > > Michael, > > > > I got it working, but using Salience alone. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Ron > > > > On 4/10/07, Ronald R. DiFrango < ron.difrango(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > > Michael, > > > > > > OK, here is my attempt to convert the flow chart I have into words: > > > > > > Step 1: Sum ObjectA > > > Step 2: Sum ObjectB > > > Step 3: Sum ObjectC > > > Step 4: Perform check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do something > > > if it fails > > > Step 5: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and > > > do something if it fails > > > Step 6: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and > > > do something if it fails > > > > > > I literally need it in this order and I was thinking that agenda > > > groups along with salience could get me there, but I have never used them > > > before. > > > > > > Does that help? > > > > > > Ron > > > > > > On 4/6/07, Michael Rhoden < mrhoden(a)franklinamerican.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > > > > Please give a better example or some pseudo code of what you are > > > > trying to do. > > > > > > > > -Michael > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > *From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto: > > > > rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Ronald R. > > > > DiFrango > > > > *Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 8:15 AM > > > > *To:* Rules Users List > > > > *Subject:* [rules-users] Rules Design Question > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > I have a rules design question for the community. I have 3 lists > > > > of different types of objects that I need to sum if a certain attribute is > > > > present on each one of them. Then after the summing has taken place execute > > > > other rules based upon the results of the summation. > > > > > > > > Is there a way that I can accomplish this via salience or agenda > > > > groups? > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > > > Ron > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >