Re: [rules-users] [Planner] Planning problem - looking for tips, and advices for complicated case

Thank you for your replay! I think I can explain briefly its practical usage. This collections, I mentioned before, are providers who offer different "goods" with configurable parameters (our planning variables). Clients can order "goods" with specific parameters (parameters specified by client, can be range of values for example: from 1 to 10; or array of values: 1,2,3), we check if any of our providers are able to create what our client ordered, and pick the best solution (based on price, and parameters). If our project will open its source I might talk about it in more detail later, and link it here. I will try approach A, currently I'm using custom move factory, but I always thought that every single planning variable must have its own move factory... my bad. Also this approach looks fairly easy to implement, and maybe I will switch to version 6.0.0.Beta1. I will give you an update next week if I had any luck with it. ge0ffrey wrote Actually it was enabled, but there was no errors, solver just kept on moving, and in logs all I could find was "move score (...) for move: (...)" and the logs from rules I made... On the other hand when I removed my rule which checked if variables was from the same provider, solver as expected timeout after 120sec and returned actual best solution. This rule had a lot of compare operations etc, so that might have been the cause in someway. ge0ffrey wrote I thought that multiple @PlanningEntities might have help, if I would use one of the @PlanningEntities to find best offered "Good" from each of the providers, then other @PlanningEntity would pick the best "good" from the "goods" found earlier. But it was just one of the ideas I was thinking about. Thank you for your advices again, Mateusz -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Planner-Planning-problem-looking-for-ti... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.