Thanks for responding
Yes, I did consider agenda groups, but I thought agenda groups only ordered
execution in a particular fashion, so if Rule "pick group X" fires then it
would make sure that rules in Agenda Group X fire first before the remaining
but the remaining would fire eventually. Is my understanding correct ?
I am looking for a solution for completely isolating a rule set conditioned
on an object attribute.
On Feb 1, 2008 12:46 AM, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1(a)ford.com> wrote:
What about Agenda Groups?
Rule "pick group X"
when
Fact( attribute = "condition1" )
then
drools.setFocus("Group X")
end
Rule "pick group Y"
when
Fact( attribute = "condition2" )
then
drools.setFocus("Group Y")
end
Rule "Group X1"
Agenda Group "Group X"
when
Smurf( )
then
// Do something
end
Rule "Group X2"
Agenda Group "Group X"
when
Smurfette( )
then
// Something else
end
etc
------------------------------
*From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Jai Vasanth
*Sent:* 31 January 2008 19:45
*To:* rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
*Subject:* [rules-users] Grouping rules
Hi,
I am building a system where I would need to fire different sets of rules
based on some attribute in the fact object.
Here are someways which I thought of, I was wondering if there was
something better than that.
1) I could do this by creating different sessions based on the data
attrbute (different sessions would have different rule packages based on the
attribute)
or
2) Have all the rules fire (all the different sets of rules) irrespective
of the attribute and have them insert fact new objects into the working
memory. In the second round of rules, collect the (newly made) fact objects
based on the attribute and take that action.
Thanks
Jai
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users