Thanks Chris, that does work.
oh man, I tried something so similar to that with the parenethisis last
night using my "programming by trial and error" methodology.
many thanks to everyone who replied, it's all been a great help!
Richard
Chris Woodrow wrote:
Hi,
even
Test (y == (x + 1))
works.
Richard : I think you should take a look at this before planning doing
complicated calculations with drools
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/2008-April/005247.html but it
might be fixed now.
Chris
2008/5/2 Raffi Khatchadourian <khatchad(a)cse.ohio-state.edu>:
> On Fri 2.May'08 at 10:05:20 +0100, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
>
> > The "when" section matches fact (object) patterns, so your
requirement
> > could be written as:-
> >
> > when there is a Test Fact 'A' and another Test Fact 'B' where
"the 'x'
> > property of 'A'" equals "the 'y' property of fact
'B' plus 1" then.....
> >
> > This would become:-
> >
> > rule "Rule 1"
> > when
> > Test( $y : y )
> > Test( x == ($y + 1) )
> >
>
> Could you combine these conditions? As in:
>
> when
> Test($y : y, x == $y + 1)
> //...
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/newbie-question-on-%22when%22-condition-syntax-tp17...
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.