Re: [rules-users] is this kind of App right for DROOLS?
Uaw.. very nice example, Greg... Thanks
I really like these Drools solution.
I will try your example with some more heavy class (with 40 attributes)
and expand the volume to 2.6 mi objects coming from a hibernate
session..
I'll let you know.... I think I will enjoy those tests :-D
Thanks again
Kris
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 23:01 -0700, Greg Barton wrote:
Yes, drools can handle this, and can handle the volume. You may want
to consider sequential mode execution, though. See attached code for some simple matching
rules. In the example there's a 5% chance a transaction with a given id will not be
present. You could mock this up further to have rules to handle matching in the case a
simple match isn't possible.
--- On Tue, 4/14/09, Learning BRMS <rulerhawk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Learning BRMS <rulerhawk(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: [rules-users] is this kind of App right for DROOLS?
> To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 10:43 PM
> Hi people...
>
> I need to solve a problem on my work and I would hear from
> you if Drools
> could help us...
>
> I have two kinds of "connected by flatfile"
> systems that register our
> products selling transactions.
>
> We need to match dayly every selling transaction against
> both systems
> and to track any difference for every store.
>
> An transaction could happens on system A and not and system
> B and
> vice-versa and on different dates or times (connection
> problems could
> delay the synchronizing).
> The transaction mostly have the same ID, but there are
> manual
> transactions too with no id only date and values...
>
> For each situation I have to fire a different action
> resolution (today
> we have humanhand resolution).
>
> We should have an 1 million of transactions by day to
> process...
>
> Today we are using a sql script to do reports that will be
> humanly
> analyzed...
>
> I want to change this picture as soon as possible...
>
> Could Drools help us with this kind of analyze, and support
> this volume
> of objects?
>
> How many objects could we have on working memory at same
> time for that
> match?
>
> Thanks a lot for any comments
>
> Kris
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users