Re: [rules-users] Understanding agenda-group (doesn't work as documented in book or docs)
LOL, by "jeopardize the intention of the developer" you mean "guess
what
the developer wanted to do but didn't know how to model" or more like
"teach
the developer how to use a stack"? :)
Seriously, there is a reason why stacks work like they do and why
agenda-groups are handled as stacks. You can try to use ruleflow-groups
instead of agenda-groups, if you want to coordinate your rules in a more
straight forward (I guess we could say more natural, sequential) way.
Although, even with ruleflow-groups, you need to model them in the correct
order or things will not go as you would like them to.
Edson
2010/1/21 Pritam <infinity2heaven(a)gmail.com>
I set
session.getAgenda().getAgendaGroup("group1").setFocus();
session.getAgenda().getAgendaGroup("group2").setFocus();
and only group1 rule fires, but when I set
session.getAgenda().getAgendaGroup("group2").setFocus();
session.getAgenda().getAgendaGroup("group1").setFocus();
both group1 and group2 rules are fired.
It looks like setfocus internally is adding to the stack "in the order in
which it is called."
It would be nice to have a addfocus instead that doesn't jeopardize the
intention of the developer.
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Understanding-agenda-group-doesn-t-work-as-documente...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.5 KB)