Re: [rules-users] Rules categorization/packages

Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that and convert to lower case and try. I remember facing this issue sometime back with 5.0 Thanks Amit On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Its coming from a JAR > Thanks > Amit > > Equipment entityId int partNumber String manufacturer > String owningEntityId int Software entityId int OSType String > OSVersion String imageName String EquipmentCA extends Equipment > hostname String productName String productFamily String > productId String > 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com&gt; > > Are you importing your model from a .jar or using a Declarative Model? >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola(a)redhat.com&gt;wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Its possible that there are some bugs in the snapshots. Can you tell me >>> what your model looks like? >>> >>> Toni >>> >>> Amit Kumar wrote: >>> > The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor >>> > They do seem rich in features .. especially support for >>> > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with inbox and global packages. >>> > >>> > But But But.. on adding a fact in the when/then clause then all the >>> > attributes of the facts are not coming .. some attributes come.. not >>> > all of them. >>> > I am picking it from here >>> > >>> https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/t... >>> > Any other place I can look :) >>> > >>> > Thanks >>> > Amit >>> > >>> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar(a)gmail.com >>> > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Thanks Jervis!! >>> > >>> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jervisliu <jliu(a)redhat.com >>> > <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>> wrote: >>> > >>> > A new feature called "Sharable artifacts/Global artifacts" >>> will be >>> > available in Drools 5.1. This feature allows you share an >>> > asset among >>> > different packages. It also creates a global area (you can >>> > consider it >>> > as a global package). Potentially you can promote an asset >>> > that you >>> > think is more appropriate to be defined in a global scope from >>> > your >>> > current package to the global area, so that this global asset >>> > can be >>> > reused by every package. This feature is already on trunk, >>> > maybe you >>> > want to give it a try. Any comments or feedbacks will be >>> highly >>> > appreciated. >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > Jervis >>> > >>> > >>> > Amit Kumar wrote: >>> > > Hello All, >>> > > >>> > > I am looking to organize the rules in different categories. >>> > But for >>> > > distribution purposes We are creating packages for different >>> > > roles/processing phases >>> > > >>> > > So a rule will reside in one pckage but for navigation it >>> > can belong >>> > > to multiple categories >>> > > >>> > > So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes, Sweaters >>> > > Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and those have >>> sub >>> > > categories witin them >>> > > >>> > > We have rules which will device the category of the item >>> > > Like "red rule", "blue rule", "cloth rule", leather rule" >>> > > >>> > > Now the problem we are facing is for category rules is if I >>> > define the >>> > > rule in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot use it >>> > in Pant >>> > > package.. Will have to redefine it. >>> > > >>> > > The other problem in this scenario is If I have a price rule >>> > in Shirt >>> > > package and the category is "Blue Color" and "XL Size" then >>> > I will >>> > > have to put it in both categories >>> > > When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue Category" and "XL Rule" >>> > on "XL >>> > > Category" and I put the rule in both categories.. will it >>> > be an "and" >>> > > relationship or will be an "OR" >>> > > >>> > > Regards, >>> > > Amit >>> > > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > rules-users mailing list >>> > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto: >>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; >>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> > > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > rules-users mailing list >>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto: >>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; >>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > rules-users mailing list >>> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-users mailing list >>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >> >> Esteban Aliverti >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users