Hi Justin,
Many thanks for your advices! I'll stick to directory and naming
conventions for the moment.
Best regards,
Bruno.
Justin Case a écrit :
Hi,
> Are you talking about DroolsCompilerAntTask and DroolsVerifierAntTask
>
> Ant tasks (that I discovered after having read you email)?
>
I actually wrote my own compiler task, for reasons of playing with the class
loader and pre-merging all files - performance-increasing tricks which with
5.1.1 don't bring anything anymore. So yes, the Drools own Ant task is today
just as good.
> the Drools RCP plugin enables to create "rule resources", either
"rule
> packages" (a DRL file with package, import, globals...) in a single DRL
>
[...]
> For the moment I tend to think that, like in Guvnor UI, the solution is
> to have conventions (this directory contains "individual rules", that
> directory contains "rule packages", that one "business
rules"...).
>
I'm using only DRL files (technical, like your rule packages) and they are
indeed grouped by naming conventions. I don't find this way particularly great
and I think I should allocate some time to rethink it...
JC
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users