Hi Joe,
Thanks for correcting me.
This image indeed proves your point:
http://java.sun.com/docs/hotspot/gc5.0/fig4.gif
As well as this thread:
http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t683307-question-on-xms-xmx-and-xx-...
Very interesting, I had it wrong for years.
Op 09-02-12 13:27, Joe Ammann schreef:
On 02/09/2012 09:34 AM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
> The perm gen space is a subset of the heap space.
> So it doesn't make sense to put them on the same value.
>
> Try this instead:
> -Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m
> Or, if that fails:
> -Xmx2048m -XX:MaxPermSize=1024m
>
Sorry to disagree Geoffrey, but PermGen is NOT a part of heap in all
(Sun) JVM's that I'm aware of. See
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2129044/java-heap-terminology-young-ol...
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/gc-tuning-5-138395.html (the
picture a few pages down)
So the sizes are specified separately. But having a MaxPerm of 1G and
STILL see PermGen OOM is strange.
The problem could be, that when using the CMS (concurrent mark sweep)
GC, PermGen is not collected. I have seen cases where sooner or later
OOM PermGen errors happened consistently, until we added
|-XX:+CMSPermGenSweepingEnabled|
--
CU, Joe
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet