Hi, I think this is the best use case for agenda-groups + auto-focus...
i.e., you add your rules to your kbase, and the rules remain there and will
not fire, unless an extraordinary condition is detected, in which case the
auto-focus will trigger, "pausing" the execution of the other rules to do
whatever is necessary to handle the extraordinary condition. After it is
fixed, the processing resumes with the regular rules.
Not sure if that is what you are looking for, but hope it helps.
Edson
2011/6/29 wendy <w.mungovan(a)yahoo.com>
Hi,
I'm working on a system that has a large number of rules and we are
getting to the point where we think it would be useful to have some 'debug'
or 'warning' type rules (for lack of a better word). The warning rules
would be rules that would signal to us that something is wrong with the
underlying data and would require someone to go in and fix something. I
was
wondering if there are some standard practice as to how to write, maintain,
format... these rules. I can think of a couple of ways to do this but I
would like the communities opinion. We would also like the ability to turn
on/off these debug or warning rules easily while the rest of the system
keeps on processing.
Thank you,
Wendy
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Common-Practices-for-warning-or-debug-r...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss by Red Hat @
www.jboss.com