Re: [rules-users] Creating a long literal
hmmm.. in an eval it *should* work - I assume there is a compile error that
mentions the L ?
well this should not be a problem in 3.2, but for 3.0.x we can certainly
look at it if you have a unit test.
A literal outside of an eval shouldn't be needed - as the type is inferenced
from the facts automatically.
On 2/3/07, Aziz Boxwala <boxwala(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Is there a way to create a long literal in a rule condition?
Typing 30L results in a syntax error because of the L at the end. The
error occurs even if I put this literal in eval.
--Aziz
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.3 KB)