Re: [rules-users] Agenda-group in fact insert time

Thank you so much Wolfgang (is that your name? I saw that in some other posts. Cool )! Yes, now I know the benefit of this approach, now I am wondering why we are only left with one option? Could I propose a new and easy API that you can create a session from kbase with rules in a particular agenda-group(s)? Then start inserting fact to that session, so that rules in other agenda-groups will not be evaluated under this user's choice. Until then, do you think maintaining different kbases for each agenda-group (i.e. one agenda-group in one kbase) is a good idea? When rules in an agenda-group are needed to be fired, that kbase is used to create session(s). When rules across more than one agenda-groups are needed to be fired, those kbases can be added together to form a bigger kbase to create a session. This method is not perfect nor an ultimate solution. This is just a trade off for performance vs flexibility. By doing that, we for sure cannot write dynamic agenda-group focusing rules (those rules will not break down, just there will be no such group for that session) and which groups to fire must be planned beforehand. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Agenda-group-in-fact-insert-time-tp4023... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.