Re: [rules-users] Evaluate rules for multiple facts of the same type within a StateuflSession

Hi, Just as a small remark: it is not always clear to me why some approaches are considered cumbersome and others are considered to be fine. Imagining your example - let me try to clarify. What is your business rule? When a shopping cart contains a dog and dog food Then apply a reduction of 10% to the cart Or is it: When a shopping cart contains a dog and a dog food AND no other reductions are applied Then apply a reduction of 10% to the cart To me, it seems like the latter would be the business rule... Then, why is there so much obstruction against using the fact that an other reduction applied as a blocker in other rules? Regards, Frank I would like to apologize in advance if I seem angry or upset in this reply. I can assure you, I'm not. Let me proof this with a smiley :-D -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Evaluate-rules-for-multiple-facts-of-th... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.