Re: [rules-users] [Drools Planner] Hard constraint appears to be ignored - How to isolate a working memory corruption in drools expert
Closing this thread!
Error was in this code-block:
{code}
fooLeft.setBar(fooRight.getBar());
fooRight.setBar(barLeft);
session.update(fooLeftFact, fooLeft);
session.update(fooRightFact, fooRight);
{code}
following fix makes the error go away:
{code}
fooLeft.setBar(fooRight.getBar());
session.update(fooLeftFact, fooLeft);
fooRight.setBar(barLeft);
session.update(fooRightFact, fooRight);
{code}
Pull request retracted and I have a bad taste in my mouth since I have no
technical/logical explanation why so.
Thank you guys for all the help!
On 03/09/2012 02:21 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
Works also with 5.4.0.Beta2.
Does this really fail in the context of Drools' unit tests?
-W
On 9 March 2012 12:23, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com
<mailto:wolfgang.laun@gmail.com>> wrote:
Can't reproduce the described effect with 5.3.0.Final, will look at
5.4.0.Beta2 later today.
As far as I can see, the test case asserts the correct result which
Drools produces anyway?
-W
On 09/03/2012, ge0ffrey <ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com
<mailto:ge0ffrey.spam@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Great work Reinis!
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Drools-Planner-Hard-constra...
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users