[rules-users] 答复: 答复: 答复: Concurrent rule fire

Laun, See below. Thanks Abe 发件人: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] 代表 Wolfgang Laun 发送时间: 2012年1月8日 23:59 收件人: Rules Users List 主题: Re: [rules-users] 答复: 答复: Concurrent rule fire The question of how to handle program failures is not a Drools issue. Processing transaction data with a RBS isn't much differenf. A simple analysis must anszwer questions such as * Is processing of one transaction in any way dependent on the processing of previous transactions? //No. I can get correct result when I re-load and re-process the transaction. * Is it necessary to conserve the results of one transactions in Working Memory? //no. we have all transactions’ status recorded in DB when start matching. * For a restart: How can you establish check points? //check points are set to the beginning when system receives transactions. * Is it necessary to execute all transactions in one huge bunch? //not necessary. We have transaction partition set already. Different regions will go to different instances/ sessions. * If one transaction fails, can you recover and continue? How can you deal with the failed transaction later on? //I will just load the received transaction and re-process it. In short - questions that have been asked since the invention of data processing ;-) But an answer requires - as always - detailed information. // I agree with your comments. I guess I misled people here by saying DR… what I really want to know is just if Drools will prevent firing the same rules against the same working memory concurrently… -W 2012/1/8 Zhuo Li <milanello1998(a)gmail.com&gt; That is my question actually. Say if I have one rule which is scheduled to run twice a day, what about if the first schedule failed and got restarted, but when the first job is still running, the second job’s schedule time arrives. Will the second schedule wait for first to finish? Best Abe 发件人: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] 代表 Nicolas Héron 发送时间: 2012年1月8日 23:08 收件人: Rules Users List 主题: Re: [rules-users] 答复: Concurrent rule fire Hi, You can use more than one drools session ? Regards Nicolas Héron 2012/1/8 Zhuo Li <milanello1998(a)gmail.com&gt; Any comments? 发件人: Zhuo Li [mailto:milanello1998@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2012年1月8日 0:35 收件人: 'Rules Users List' 主题: Concurrent rule fire Hi, folks, My project will handle about 1.5 M transactions per hour using Drools and the rules’ fire are scheduled based on business operation cycle which might happen a few times a day. Say if I need to fire the same rule set twice at 10:00 PM and midnight. What will happen if the first execution has not completed till midnight? Will the 2nd execution be held up till the 1st is completed? I would assume there might still be transactions inserted into working memory between 10:00 PM and midnight although it is very few. My understanding is Drools will enforce only one active thread is working for the same “then” section for data consistency. Any thoughts? Best Abe _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users