Re: [rules-users] equality-based assert behavior and findFactHandle

Adam, Yes, you are right. I'm not sure why it uses the identity map instead of assert map, but maybe we should change that or at least providing an alternative method for that. May I ask you please to open a JIRA for it? Mark, are you ok with changing the behavior? []s Edson 2007/10/29, Adam Lewandowski <adam(a)alewando.com <mailto:adam@alewando.com>>: If I set my rule base to use equality-based assert behavior, I'm expecting to be able to use the getFactHandle(object) method to retrieve a previously asserted fact by providing an equivalent (by equals() and hashCode()) object as an argument. This appears to not be the case, as AbstractWorkingMemory uses it's identityMap and associated IdentityAssertMapComparator to do the getFactHandle lookup instead of the assertMap and EqualityAssertMapComparator. This causes the lookup to be done with the system hashCode() method and not the overridden version supplied in my fact class. The lookup thus fails and returns null. Is there a way to have getFactHandle or some equivalent code do what I want? This is with 4.0.3. Thanks, Adam Lewandowski _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Edson Tirelli Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer Office: +55 11 3529-6000 Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com <http://www.jboss.com> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users