Re: [rules-users] Abstracting Rules using extends

Using a drl-defined class for defining the constants is all right, but these values have to be used while creating a Vehicle object. People maintaining the rules may not be the ones responsible for the code creating the facts, and that's where these values will have to be used for setting the Vehicle.type property. If the order of Vehicles in a collection is relevant, you should not base reasoning on their sequence in some List<>. Use a property sequenceNumber. And reconsider not using Vehicles and "from". -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Abstracting-Rules-using-extends-tp40232... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.