Re: [rules-users] "in" syntax breaking the Rete Tree
On 21/02/2014, droolster <quant.coder(a)gmail.com> wrote:
For developers
who are new to Drools (like me), one of the assurances we get that our
rules
are properly defined is the Rete viewer. If the Rete Viewer shows errors,
then it gives doubts about whether the rules are properly defined. In my
Are we talking about the same view, i.e., the canvas where garishly
coloured blobs are shown? I would not trust this, either way. There is
the parser, for syntax errors. As for logical errors, there are formal
methods (difficult) and tests (...).
case, the rules still function correctly but if I am going take my
rule
engine into a Production environment I want all the assurances I can get.
True, but there are better ways indeed.
-W