Re: [rules-users] Flow - handling multiple events of the same kind

salaboy wrote: Sure! The case is one where an asynchronous workitem - that is, one which doesn't call completeWorkItem from within executeWorkItem - creates messages which need to invoke additional business-process behavior. These could be made to invoke secondary processes, but there's a lot of economy in keeping their behavior within the same process - error-handling, external aborting, and monitoring are all a lot simpler. -Ed -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Flow-handling-multipl... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.