Re: [rules-users] Rule using accumulate

If the age of Offers is so important it ought to be represented as fact data. If it cannot be added to the Offer itself, a proxy fact could be created, combining a counter with an Offer reference. A high salience rule for an Offer without OfferProxy would create this. -W On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Andres Corvetto <acorvetto(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > Thank you for your reply! > I understand your approach, and I think it could work if Offers were > inserted into the working memory after the Bid. > However, to implement your approach for already inserted Offers I think I > would need some way of forcing the matching Offer to be the oldest in > memory, is that possible? > The rule would be something like: > > rule "Match Offer" >        when >                $b : PartiallyCoveredBid(uncoveredSize>0, $p:price) >                $o : Offer(price<$p. alreadyUsed==false, [this is the > oldest Offer in > memory with these conditions]) >        then >            [ add Offer $o to Bid $b] > end > > Thanks again >       Andrés > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rule-using-accumulate... > Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users