Thanks Thomas. I included this but it makes little difference.
/Ryan.
________________________________
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On
Behalf Of Swindells, Thomas
Sent: 26 April 2010 15:55
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] How to make this rule more memory efficient?
You should probably restrict it so that
$cell2 : Cell(this != $cell1)
Thomas
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On
Behalf Of Ryan Fitzgerald
Sent: 26 April 2010 15:34
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: [rules-users] How to make this rule more memory efficient?
Hi,
Can anyone advise me on how to make a drools rule more memory efficient? Here is the
problem:
I have a Cell and a ProxyCell object classes.
The ProxyCell represents the Cell when their internal ID's match.
Each Cell and ProxyCell however has a unique name (not same as ID).
A Cell can reference (by name) a ProxyCell (as long as the ProxyCell does not represent
that actual Cell - which would effectively be a self-reference and is not allowed).
What I want to do is find out where I have a reference from any instance of Cell - cell1 -
to any instance of ProxyCell - proxycell2 - but am missing a reference from cell2 to
proxycell1 where proxycell2 is a representation of cell2 and proxycell1 is a
representation of cell1.
Here is the rule I have written for it:
rule "Check consistent references"
when
$cell1 : Cell()
$cell2 : Cell()
$proxycell1 : ProxyCell ( id = $cell1.id, $cell2.references contains this.name )
$proxycell2 : ProxyCell ( id = $cell2.id, $cell1.references not contains this.name
)
then
//report an error.....
end
I have 10,000 instances of Cell and 10,000 instances of ProxyCell in working memory. For
each instance of Cell, it can have references to 60 different ProxyCell instances. Loading
the Cell and ProxyCell instances into working memory is not a problem. However, when I try
to run this rule above, the memory quickly goes above 1GB and I eventually get an out of
memory error.
I was wondering if there is a better way to structure or write this rule so that it
doesn't use so much memory.
Thanks,
Ryan.
________________________________
**************************************************************************************
This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have received
this message in error, please immediately notify the postmaster(a)nds.com and delete it from
your system as well as any copies. The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be
monitored by NDS for employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please
do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex, TW18 4EX, United
Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered no. 3080780. VAT no. GB 603
8808 40-00
**************************************************************************************
________________________________
This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have received
this message in error, please immediately notify the postmaster(a)nds.com and delete it from
your system as well as any copies. The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be
monitored by NDS for employment and security purposes.
To protect the environment please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
An NDS Group Limited company.
www.nds.com