Best might indeed be to update the id to a long instead of a String.
Also check out
Could you open a JIRA for this?
Kris
Quoting Vijay K Pandey <VPandey(a)mdes.ms.gov>:
Thanks for the reply Kris.
Before posting to the forum I tested with different name of "id"
column such as "primaryid". The name "id" is not a problem as I have
already generated the DDL for the tables of WSHT task and all the
tables got created fine with "id" as the primary key column with
'bigint' as the column type.
So just to test it again I changed the 'id' column name to
'primaryid' - the error is same
Error: Incorrect column specifier for column 'primaryid'
SQLState: 42000
ErrorCode: 1063
When i converted the varchar to bigint for the 'id' column - tables
got created fine.
Do let me know what do you think and how should I approach this
issue?
Vijay
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Kris
Verlaenen
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 6:11 PM
To: Rules Users List; Vijay K Pandey
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools Flow BAM Module(5.1.0.M1) - Why
primary key's are of string/varchar type
Does changing the type of the id field from String to long fix your
issue? Because to me it seems that MySQL is not accepting the name
"id"
as a valid column name? I guess changing the mapping so that it uses
a
different column name could fix the issue?
Kris
Quoting Vijay K Pandey <VPandey(a)mdes.ms.gov>:
> I am using Drools Flow BAM (5.1.0.M1) module to store the
processes
> instances for audit purpose. I generated the DDL with the help of
> Hibernate Tools against the MYSQL 5.1(INNODB)
>
> DDL for the 2 tables are given below -- the interesting part is
the
> "id" column as "varchar" ---- this gives error when we try to
execute
> the DDL against the mysql.
>
> create table AUDIT_NODE_INSTANCE_LOG (
> id varchar(255) not null auto_increment,
> type integer,
> nodeInstanceId varchar(255),
> nodeId varchar(255),
> processInstanceId bigint,
> processId varchar(255),
> DATE datetime,
> primary key (id)
> ) ENGINE=InnoDB;
>
> create table AUDIT_PROCESS_INSTANCE_LOG (
> id varchar(255) not null auto_increment,
> processInstanceId bigint,
> processId varchar(255),
> START_DATE datetime,
> END_DATE datetime,
> primary key (id)
> ) ENGINE=InnoDB;
>
> The error we get is
>
> Error: Incorrect column specifier for column 'id'
> SQLState: 42000
> ErrorCode: 1063
> Error occured in:
> create table AUDIT_NODE_INSTANCE_LOG (
> id varchar(255) not null auto_increment,
> type integer,
> nodeInstanceId varchar(255),
> nodeId varchar(255),
> processInstanceId bigint,
> processId varchar(255),
> DATE datetime,
> primary key (id)
> ) ENGINE=InnoDB
>
> I used a naming strategy for the hibernate that's why the above
table
> names.
>
> My question is when the primary key generation is "native" why not
> let these columns be of type 'long' and get generated as
"bigint"
> for the sql type.
>
> If they can't be changed - should we just extend the above classes
> and have these fields as long/bigint.
>
> Any suggestion will be appreciated.
>
> Thanks
> Vijay
>
Disclaimer:
http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users