8:06 a.m.
I've tested all 4 cases. It is strange that each Rule fired exactly one time,
directly before the exception occurs. Here the rules, I've built them exactly
for this problem.
============================================
Test 1(isEqualMore):
rule "Test Experiment 1"
no-loop
when
$a1:ODMAnswer()
$a2:ODMAnswer(
!isEqual($a1,$a2),
comesAfter($a1,$a2,50))
$a3:ODMAnswer(
comesAfter($a2,$a3,20),
!isEqualMore($a1,$a2,$a3))
then
System.out.println("Test 1 works");
end
Result:
Same Runtime exception
============================================
Test 2(isEqualThree):
rule "Test Experiment 2"
no-loop
when
$a1:ODMAnswer()
$a2:ODMAnswer(
!isEqual($a1,$a2),
comesAfter($a1,$a2,50))
$a3:ODMAnswer(
comesAfter($a2,$a3,20),
!isEqualThree($a1,$a2,$a3))
then
System.out.println("Test 2 works");
end
Result:
Works perfect without errors.
============================================
Test 3(isEqualMore):
rule "Test Experiment 3"
no-loop
when
$a1:ODMAnswer()
$a2:ODMAnswer(
!isEqual($a1,$a2),
comesAfter($a1,$a2,5))
($a3:ODMAnswer(
comesAfter($a2,$a3,5)) and
eval(!isEqualMore($a1,$a2,$a3)))
then
System.out.println("Test 3 works");
end
Result:
Works also without errors (I'm surprised).
============================================
Test 4(isEqualThree):
rule "Test Experiment 4"
no-loop
when
$a1:ODMAnswer()
$a2:ODMAnswer(
!isEqual($a1,$a2),
comesAfter($a1,$a2,5))
($a3:ODMAnswer(
comesAfter($a2,$a3,5)) and
eval(!isEqualThree($a1,$a2,$a3)))
then
System.out.println("Test 4 works");
end
Result:
Works perfect, but seems to get more matches
than the 3. experiment.
============================================
Fazit:
In my eyes there seems to be a problem using a loop in a constraint.
Even if I use different names (see Test 2), I'm still getting the
runtime exception. As bonus test-case I've tried using Test 3 and
overloading the function, rather than using a different function name,
but this also failed.
Seems that I have to use eval() and different names if I want to compare
multiple named entities, though I still don't know why. Maybe the isEqual
call in the loop is calling itself and generating an out of bounds exception
at the last array entity.
Thank you wolfgang.
JB
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
Von: "Wolfgang Laun" <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>
An: "Rules Users List" <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. März 2013 13:36:12
Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Cannot invoke method because of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
You have lost me - I'm not sure anymore what works and what doesn't.
Please check or rewrite, using the names
isEqualMore(Annotation... annos)
isEqualThree(Annotation a1, Annotation a2, Annotation a3)
1) not $a5:ODMAnswer(..., ! isEqualX($a3,$a4,$a5) )
does not work for X==More and
does not work for X==Three
2) not( $a5:ODMAnswer(...) and eval( ! isEqualX($a3,$a4,$a5) )
works for X==More and
works for X==Three
-W
On 07/03/2013, Bojan Janisch <bojan.janisch(a)scai.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> Experiment 1
> Please write isEqualThree for 3 Annotation arguments and use this,
> just to make sure that these Problems are caused by Drools. (Do NOT
> rely on overloading, use another name.)
I've created an isEqualThree function
public static boolean isEqualThree(Annotation a, Annotation b, Annotation
c){
if(isEqual(a,b) || isEqual(b,c) || isEqual(a,c)){
return true;
}
return false;
}
By the way, it works also with overloading, I've never had problems with
overloading in Drools. And I've tested also with different names, the
problem
remains, even using different function names.
> Experiment 2
> Using the isEqual as it is now, rewrite the last pattern as:
>
> not ( $a5:ODMAnswer(
> isInAnnotation($a1,$a5),
> isBigger($a3,$a5) )
> and
> eval( ! isEqual($a3,$a4,$a5) )
> )
Your condition works without problems using the isEqualThree function, it
works
also if I overload the function. It also works if I put the isEqual
condition out
of the eval, into the object constraints. But if I want to use my primary
idea, using
different names,
public static boolean isEqualMore(Annotation... a)
I still get the same error from the isEqualMore function.
java.lang.RuntimeException: cannot invoke method: isEqualMore
at
de.fraunhofer.scai.bio.uima.core.deploy.StatusCallbackListenerImpl.entityProcessComplete(StatusCallbackListenerImpl.java:151)
at
org.apache.uima.collection.impl.cpm.engine.CPMThreadGroup.notifyListener(CPMThreadGroup.java:103)
at
org.apache.uima.collection.impl.cpm.engine.CPMThreadGroup.uncaughtException(CPMThreadGroup.java:86)
at java.lang.Thread.dispatchUncaughtException(Thread.java:1888)
Caused by: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 3
at
org.mvel2.optimizers.impl.refl.nodes.MethodAccessor.executeAll(MethodAccessor.java:149)
at
org.mvel2.optimizers.impl.refl.nodes.MethodAccessor.getValue(MethodAccessor.java:48)
at org.mvel2.ast.ASTNode.getReducedValueAccelerated(ASTNode.java:108)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.ExecutableAccessor.getValue(ExecutableAccessor.java:38)
at org.mvel2.ast.Negation.getReducedValueAccelerated(Negation.java:48)
at org.mvel2.MVELRuntime.execute(MVELRuntime.java:85)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.CompiledExpression.getValue(CompiledExpression.java:123)
at
org.mvel2.compiler.CompiledExpression.getValue(CompiledExpression.java:116)
at org.mvel2.MVEL.executeExpression(MVEL.java:930)
at
org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConditionEvaluator.evaluate(MvelConditionEvaluator.java:70)
at
org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConditionEvaluator.ensureBranchEvaluation(MvelConditionEvaluator.java:113)
at
org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConditionEvaluator.ensureCompleteEvaluation(MvelConditionEvaluator.java:106)
at
org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConditionEvaluator.ensureCompleteEvaluation(MvelConditionEvaluator.java:90)
at
org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConditionEvaluator.getAnalyzedCondition(MvelConditionEvaluator.java:82)
at
org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConstraint.executeJitting(MvelConstraint.java:214)
at
org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConstraint.access$000(MvelConstraint.java:41)
at org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConstraint$1.run(MvelConstraint.java:201)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
JB
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
Von: "Wolfgang Laun" <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>
An: "Rules Users List" <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. März 2013 06:46:29
Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Cannot invoke method because
of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
On 06/03/2013, Bojan Janisch <bojan.janisch(a)scai.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> But that's exactly what java is doing if you say the Arguments are
> method(X... xs).
> Java is then generating an array of the type you set and you can work with
> xs like an
> normal array.
Yes, Java, but.
> By the way, seems I get this Error
>
> Unable to Analyse Expression isEqual(new Annotation[]{$a3,$a4,$a5})
> [Error: could not instantiate class]
> [Near : {... isEqual(new Annotation[]{$a3,$a4,$a5}) ....}]
> ^
> [Line: 129, Column: 8]
Suspicious, may have to raise a JIRA.
Experiment 1
Please write isEqualThree for 3 Annotation arguments and use this,
just to make sure that these Problems are caused by Drools. (Do NOT
rely on overloading, use another name.)
Experiment 2
Using the isEqual as it is now, rewrite the last pattern as:
not ( $a5:ODMAnswer(
isInAnnotation($a1,$a5),
isBigger($a3,$a5) )
and
eval( ! isEqual($a3,$a4,$a5) )
)
-W
>
>
> The changed method is:
>
> public static boolean isEqual(Annotation[] a){
> ArrayList<Annotation> outLoop = new
> ArrayList<Annotation>(Arrays.asList(a));
> ArrayList<Annotation> inLoop = new
> ArrayList<Annotation>(Arrays.asList(a));
>
> for (Annotation anno1 : outLoop) {
> inLoop.remove(anno1);
> for (Annotation anno2 : inLoop) {
> if(isEqual(anno1,anno2)){
> return true;
> }
> }
> }
>
> return false;
> }
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Wolfgang Laun" <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>
> An: "Rules Users List" <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. März 2013 17:11:43
> Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Cannot invoke method because
> of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
>
> I wouldn't use (X... xs) in this context.
>
> Try the simple modification of isEqual( Annotation[] annos ) and
> call it with isEqual( new Annotation[]{$a3,$a4,$a5})
> and we'll see what we'll see.
>
> -W
>
>
> On 06/03/2013, Bojan Janisch <bojan.janisch(a)scai.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>> Like you wish wolfgang. The complete Rule is:
>>
>> rule "Generate Finding_ConceptId"
>> no-loop
>> when
>> $a1:ODMAnswer(
>> q1:QuestionId,
>> q1.toLowerCase.contains("diagnose") ||
>> q1.toLowerCase.contains("indication"),
>> q1.toLowerCase.contains("sections"),
>> a1_begin:begin,
>> label1:ResponseAttribute)
>>
>> $a2:ODMAnswer(
>> ResponseAttribute.contains(label1),
>> QuestionId.contains("sectionheader"),
>> comesBefore($a1,$a2));
>>
>> $a3:ODMAnswer(
>> q3:QuestionId,
>> !q3.contains("finding.conceptId"),
>> !q3.contains("itemGroup"),
>> !q3.contains("section"),
>> a3_begin:begin,
>> a3_end:end,
>> label2:ResponseAttribute,
>> isInAnnotation($a1,$a3))
>>
>> $a4:ODMAnswer(
>> q4:QuestionId.contains("finding.conceptId"),
>> a4_begin:begin,
>> comesAfter($a2,$a4),
>> isBetween($a2,$a3,$a4),
>> isInAnnotation($a1,$a4))
>>
>> not $a5:ODMAnswer(
>> isInAnnotation($a1,$a5),
>> isBigger($a3,$a5),
>> !isEqual($a3,$a4,$a5))
>> then
>> String questionId = "finding.conceptId";
>> String attribute = label1 +" "+ label2;
>> int begin = a4_begin;
>> int ende = a3_end;
>> boolean addToIndexes = true;
>>
>>
>> insert(annotate(aJCas, questionId, attribute, begin, ende,
>> addToIndexes));
>> end
>>
>> The functions are in a seperate FactChecker class, because the
>> "incode-comparison"
>> was too much of a chaos. So I wrote functions which explains themselves
>> what
>> they do:
>> ==================================================================
>> public static boolean isInAnnotation(Annotation a, Annotation b){
>> if(isNull(a,b)){
>> return false;
>> }
>> if(b.getBegin() > a.getBegin() && b.getEnd() < a.getEnd()){
>> return true;
>> }
>> if(a.getBegin() > b.getBegin() && a.getEnd() < b.getEnd()){
>> return true;
>> }
>> return false;
>> }
>> ==================================================================
>> public static boolean isInAnnotation(Annotation... a){
>> for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++){
>> if(i+1 == a.length){
>> return false;
>> }
>> if(isInAnnotation(a[i], a[i+1])){
>> return true;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> return false;
>> }
>> ==================================================================
>> public static boolean comesBefore(Annotation a, Annotation b){
>> if(isNull(a,b)){
>> return false;
>> }
>> if(b.getEnd() <= a.getBegin()){
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> return false;
>> }
>> ==================================================================
>> public static boolean comesAfter(Annotation a, Annotation b){
>> if(isNull(a,b)){
>> return false;
>> }
>> if(a.getEnd() <= b.getBegin()){
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> return false;
>> }
>> ==================================================================
>> public static boolean isEqual(Annotation a, Annotation b){
>> if(isNull(a,b)){
>> return false;
>> }
>> if(a.equals(b)){
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> return false;
>> }
>> ==================================================================
>> public static boolean isEqual(Annotation... a){
>> ArrayList<Annotation> outLoop = new
>> ArrayList<Annotation>(Arrays.asList(a));
>> ArrayList<Annotation> inLoop = new
>> ArrayList<Annotation>(Arrays.asList(a));
>>
>> for (Annotation anno1 : outLoop) {
>> if(anno1 == null){
>>
>> }
>> inLoop.remove(anno1);
>> for (Annotation anno2 : inLoop) {
>> if(isEqual(anno1,anno2)){
>> return true;
>> }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> return false;
>> }
>> ==================================================================
>> public static boolean isNull(Annotation... a){
>> for (Annotation annotation : a) {
>> if(annotation == null){
>> return true;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> return false;
>> }
>> ==================================================================
>> public static boolean isBigger(Annotation a, Annotation b){
>> if(isNull(a,b)){
>> return false;
>> }
>> if(a.getBegin() == b.getBegin() && a.getEnd() < b.getEnd()){
>> return true;
>> }
>> if(b.getBegin() < a.getBegin() && a.getEnd() == b.getEnd()){
>> return true;
>> }
>> if(b.getBegin() < a.getBegin() && a.getEnd() < b.getEnd()){
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> return false;
>> }
>> ==================================================================
>> public static boolean isBetween(Annotation a, Annotation b, Annotation
>> c){
>> if(isNull(a,b,c)){
>> return false;
>> }
>> Annotation min = getMin(a,b);
>> Annotation max = getMax(a,b);
>>
>> if(isOverlapping(a,c) || isOverlapping(b,c)){
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> if(c.getBegin() > min.getEnd() && c.getEnd() < max.getBegin()){
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> return false;
>> }
>> ==================================================================
>> public static Annotation getMax(Annotation a, Annotation b){
>> isNull(a,b);
>> if(a.getBegin() >= b.getBegin()){
>> return a;
>> }
>>
>> return b;
>> }
>> ==================================================================
>> public static Annotation getMin(Annotation a, Annotation b){
>> isNull(a,b);
>> if(a.getEnd() <= b.getEnd()){
>> return a;
>> }
>>
>> return b;
>> }
>> ==================================================================
>>
>> I've posted all functions that are used by the rule. Actually it crushes
>> if I use more than 2 statements in the isEqual() call in $a5.
>> It works with !isEqual($a3,$a4) && !isEqual($a3,$a5) &&
!isEqual($a4,$a5)
>> but not with !isEqual($a3,$a4,$a5).
>>
>> So do you got an idea where the problem comes from?
>>
>> JB
>>
>>
>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> Von: "Wolfgang Laun" <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>
>> An: "Rules Users List" <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. März 2013 15:09:47
>> Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Cannot invoke method because
>> of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
>>
>> Nice try - but, please, don't. Kindly post the code that actually
>> causes your problem.
>>
>> -W
>>
>>
>> On 06/03/2013, Bojan Janisch <bojan.janisch(a)scai.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>>> Hello Guys,
>>>
>>> sorry to bother you with this problem, but I'm out of ideas.
>>> I'm using Drools in textmining-context and in basic I have
>>> a function that checks 2 named entites for equality to
>>> ensure that the entities are all different and that the rules
>>> do work only on different named entity objects:
>>>
>>> public static boolean isEqual(Annotation a, Annotation b){
>>> if(a.equals(b)){
>>> return true;
>>> }
>>>
>>> return false;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Sometimes there are conditions that need tests of more than
>>> 2 named entites. For this I've written a super method that
>>> calls the isEqual method in a loop:
>>>
>>> public static boolean isEqual(Annotation... a){
>>> ArrayList<Annotation> outLoop = new
>>> ArrayList<Annotation>(Arrays.asList(a));
>>> ArrayList<Annotation> inLoop = new
>>> ArrayList<Annotation>(Arrays.asList(a));
>>>
>>> for (Annotation anno1 : outLoop) {
>>> inLoop.remove(anno1);
>>> for (Annotation anno2 : inLoop) {
>>> if(isEqual(anno1,anno2)){
>>> return true;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> return false;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> My rules could (theoretically) now call the function
>>> eval(isEqual($ne1,$ne2)) or
>>> eval(isEqual($ne1,$ne2,$ne3) or even
>>> eval(isEqual($ne1,$ne2,$ne3,$ne4,$ne5)) and so on.
>>>
>>> So there starts my problem:
>>>
>>> Each time I'm getting an ArrayIndexOutOfBounds Exception from the second
>>> method that looks like this:
>>>
>>> java.lang.RuntimeException: cannot invoke method: isEqual
>>> ...
>>> at java.lang.Thread.dispatchUncaughtException(Thread.java:1888)
>>> Caused by: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 3
>>> at
>>>
org.mvel2.optimizers.impl.refl.nodes.MethodAccessor.executeAll(MethodAccessor.java:149)
>>> at
>>>
org.mvel2.optimizers.impl.refl.nodes.MethodAccessor.getValue(MethodAccessor.java:48)
>>> at org.mvel2.ast.ASTNode.getReducedValueAccelerated(ASTNode.java:108)
>>> at
>>> org.mvel2.compiler.ExecutableAccessor.getValue(ExecutableAccessor.java:38)
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Could someone explain me what's wrong with my code? Thanks for any help.
>>>
>>> Greetings
>>> JB
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users